Quote:
Originally Posted by 600+
Where as the risk of a terror attack in the uk is higher?? Please!! The risk is the same yet the response is to send 50000 troops. You can cut the data whichever way you want in these cases.
|
The two situations aren't in the slightest way comparable, why do you think they are?
Once we've occupied Afghanistan illegally for 40 years and treated the local population as 2nd class citizens, then wondered why they resent us and attack us, then we can launch a full scale military attack killing one hundred civilians for every one of our troops and deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure despite universal condemnation from the rest of the world, call it self defence then maintain a level of squalor in the country to rival the worst ****holes around the world by refusing to allow essential medical and building supplies into the country in order to punish the civilian population further for electing a group who resist our illegal occupation/subjugation, then we'll complain how everybody is anti UK forces and dismiss criticism of our actions as "Pro-Afghanistan propaganda".
Perhaps then the situations might be comparable...