Bikes - Talk & Issues Newsworthy and topical general biking and bike related issues. No crapola! Need Help: Try Searching before posting |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Just seen the changes coming in for Mod 1. Notable one is that the emergency stop is before the avoidance exercise, and you can only do the avoidance if you have successfully done the e stop.
http://www.dft.gov.uk/dsa/News.asp?i...83A660&cat=593 |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk
Posts: 820
|
![]()
Can't wrap my head around the new test stuff. I did mine in 2001 and it was cbt>theory>test which consisted of putting the bike on it's stand, a u-turn, an emergency stop, ride around the streets and a couple of questions!
__________________
Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/39887875@N06/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
them changes look alot better actually, the first ride round the circuit for to familiarise yourself would be very helpful
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
The whole set of amends sounds very sensible to me. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
They do, as it happens...
I must admit, I do like that they've decoupled the swerve from the emergency stop, replacing the latter with a controlled stop (less precision required). It's also clear from the release why the DSA thought people were failing on that component... |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
It's through a timing gate.
Having just done mod 1 recently, it all makes a lot of sense to me. I found the avoidance harder to do than the emergency stop, so I think it should be easier to do a gradual build up from controlled stop, to emergency stop, to avoidance. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I'd love to have a go, but only if the result don't count
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Trouble is, indicated speed is higher than actual speed, do they tell you to compensate ?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Before these changes, there was no leeway on the speed measurements... you had to be doing a minimum of 50 kph on their equipment, or you would be sent around for another go. If you were short again, you would fail (might have been if you're short 3 times). No provision was made for weather either.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|