imitation is the best form of flattery

[NTECUK]

Well they do say it is.
Mind you looks the part with its up side downies.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/2208441097...84.m1423.l2649

[maviczap]

Pity Suzuki didn't think of this and do it properly

They've stolen Wideboys decal idea

[rictus01]

build quality has a way to go, but they're not a bad bike to ride as it happens.

Cheers Mark.

[NTECUK]

Originally Posted by rictus01

build quality has a way to go, but they're not a bad bike to ride as it happens.

Cheers Mark.

Have you had a go ? The HP looks a bit high.
Especially when you read some of the dyno outputs from the mini twin bikes who post on hear. The only big different I could find was roler bearings used instead of suzuki use shells.
Oh and its heavy

Ok bikes but they get tatty very quickly

I had the 125 version of that when I was learning - I wouldnt go back, buy Jap.

List price is £5199? really? WTF? I'll pass thanks.

[NTECUK]

I think the list price thing is like d f s ploy.
£3500 what your pay in the real would .

Originally Posted by NTECUK

I think the list price thing is like d f s ploy.
£3500 what your pay in the real would .

Even so, I think I would much rather buy a mint, nearly new SV from a dealer for £3500.

[rictus01]

Originally Posted by NTECUK

Have you had a go ? The HP looks a bit high.
Especially when you read some of the dyno outputs from the mini twin bikes who post on hear. The only big different I could find was roler bearings used instead of suzuki use shells.
Oh and its heavy

Yes I've ridden both the naked and faired versions, they are a little heavier, but that tends to work well on the suspension setup, in the real world the rider would make more difference than any power advantage between one and an SV, I wouldn't buy one over an SV if that was the type of bike I was after, but if one came along at the right price then maybe .

Cheers Mark.