SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking Discussion and chat on all topics and technical stuff related to the SV650 and SV1000 Need Help: Try Searching before posting |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
yesterday my light came on- I let it run to on solid and then went to fill up..
this time I took the option of the more expensive super duper petrol..just for an idea and to try it out.. I am 100% sure that the bike is running better now!//?? cud that be? or is it a placebo..my cage always feels like it runnin better when its clean so cud be just me !!... I know there have been threads on this b4 but wos is the best petrol? and wot petrol shud I avoid( yesss i know diesel b4 u say it !) avoid supermarket petrol?? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
it should make it run slightly more efficently im told. i use it too but i cant tell the difference myself.
its only something like 2% purer so i doubt u can tell the difference, maybe using the ne one for a while then going back will make it more obvious. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
prob-
ta for the response... mind u I always feel liek the bike runs well with a fll tank of petrol..must be the weight... like it need the addition with my 15 stone on it!! |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
It's not "purer" but has an octane rating of 97RON (standard unleaded in the UK is 95). It also has various additives and cleaners that should (in time) help to clean out carb jets and injector nozzles. As for extra performance you'll not likely notice anything as this is only really gained with advanced fuel injection engines that have oxygren sensors linked to powerful engine management systems.
I tend to use this stuff (Optimax or Ultimate) as it reduces carb-icing during the winter months (which my bike sadly suffers from). I've also noticed a slight improvemnet in fuel economy. So is it worth the extra money for every day use in an SV? Probably not. . |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I read somewhere that these fuels are slightly less explosive, therefore giving a longer burn in the cylinder, this is supposed to provide a little more power and be smoother through the stroke.
I fill up up with this about 1 in 10 times, mainly for its cleaning properties. I do feel a difference, but as you say it could be down just to the change of weight. Logically, I can't quite believe that I would be able to feel the difference a microsecond of extra fire would make. I use supermarket fuel mostly and never had a problem (I think it's sourced from Esso). |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I've started running with either V-Power (Shell's petrol in Holland, only 95 RON, b ut a replacement for their 98 RON fuel) or Ultimate and I think there is a diff. Plus the couple of pence extra to fill a bike makes me not care too much about the diff in cost... In the car I used it as it has improved economy so is about the same cost per KM, but supposed to be better for the engine. To be honest I have no idea if it is or not...
Stu |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The exiles of Kent
Posts: 2,184
|
![]()
A few things to consider... (ie: Prepare yourself for a long read!)
Avoid supermarket petrol... it has no or few engine detergents or lubricants, does not go through the same filtration processes as branded fuels, and in the longterm does no favours for your engine. This shows up as coked plugs, valves and injectors; and blown valve seals (very common on the old 205 1.9 GTi's - which weren't designed for unleaded fuel). Interestingly enough, the Supermarkets seem to be ditching their own brands, and teaming up with recognised petrol companies to provide their petrol/diesel. If I have a choice, I use Shell fuel. Next on the list is Texaco, and finally BP - but I try and avoid them as they're typically more expensive unless in direct competition with another forecort that's visible from theirs. Shell, Texaco, and BP, all put fuel detergents and lubricants in their respective products. Especially so in their "Super" fuels. It's these additives that are probably producing the difference that you're perceiving. A word about Octane levels, on RON levels; and compression: The Octane level can be regarded as a volatility level. The higher the number, the less volatile the fuel is. Now, don't confuse this with how hard it burns. A high octane fuel takes more energy to put it in an explosive state (ie: less volatile), but when it does explode, it burns more fiercely (ie: more power). So, imagine a piston drawing a petrol mixture into the cylinder, when the piston gets to the bottom of it's stroke, the inlet vavle closes, sealing the piston. The piston, with the motion of the engine, then rises, and compresses the fuel-air mixture that's just been drawn in. A high-compression engine, will compress this mixture more than a low-compression one. High Octane fuels need to be compressed more to achieve a full burn, than low compression fuels. Now, the SV, relative to a car, is high compression. Therefore it should burn a "Super" petrol quite happily and cleanly. But drastic power differences may not be so obvious, as the SV engine does not have the ability to adjust it's own spark timing, based on the fuel it's been fed. Now, just to go on a bit more, if you were to put a Low Octane (highly volatile) fuel in a high-compression engine, then you run the risk that the high compression, will trigger the ignition of the highly-volatile, low-octane fuel. This will probably happen before the spark, and before the piston has got to the top of it's stroke. The resulting explosion, forces the piston back on it's own stroke - this quickly leads to high engine temperatures, and then a broken engine! This last problem is not really a concern for us in Europe, where the minimum Octane you can really buy on the forecort is 95. But in the US, where low compression engines are common, 83 Octane fuels are common (equivilent to our old 2-star)... putting this fuel in something like an SV, or any sports bike, could be asking for trouble.
__________________
SV650 K3 - Gone. Now a member of the SV650.org Kawasaki brigade! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Be careful when touring Germany as well. Last time I went (2003 IIRC) most forcourts had 92 RON as their standard fuel. Then you had premium (95) and finally Super(9
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The exiles of Kent
Posts: 2,184
|
![]()
I usually use Optimax in my 306... the engine ran better, and I consistantly get better mileage to the fuel light whenever I ran a tank of it.
Over a period of months, I was able to work out that the percentage extra mileage on a tank of Optimax, was greater than the percentage extra cost over normal premium unleaded. Result: Cleaner engine, and cheaper to run - great value for money. Not sure it'd be like this on every vehicle though... probably not an SV anyway. However, I think anything with a Lambda sensor and electronic ignition should see some measureable benefit.
__________________
SV650 K3 - Gone. Now a member of the SV650.org Kawasaki brigade! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I didn't realise there was such an Issue with Supermarket fuels! I have use Asda mainly because they have the 24hr card pay lane and I go past it on the way home, convince really but if I had know their fuel was crap I would have gone slightly out of my way to use a proper petrol station.
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How dumb am I? | Shellywoozle | Idle Banter | 25 | 16-03-08 10:22 AM |
Who's a dumb a*s? | Pedrosa | Idle Banter | 4 | 12-08-07 10:07 AM |
How dumb are you??? | DanDare | Idle Banter | 14 | 09-02-06 02:09 PM |
dumb cagers | madmal | Idle Banter | 0 | 24-01-06 07:35 PM |
Am i just being a dumb ass? | Daimo | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 15 | 06-06-05 09:05 PM |