Check out Rossi's latest squeeze...

Looks like Helena Bonham Carter.

Originally Posted by Speedy Claire

I think this is a far more suitable girlfriend for him.......

- that would surely be incest!?!

[SoulKiss]

Originally Posted by dizzyblonde

well I'd have him


and Im Indoors says 'he'd have a bit of her too'


hehehe

Get in touch with Channel 4 then.

"Biker Wife Swap" the series.....

Except instead of arguments over the dishes or the kids it will be over bike bits in the sink, or tantrums over having to check his tyre pressures/oil himself :P

[dizzyblonde]

Originally Posted by SoulKiss

Get in touch with Channel 4 then.

"Biker Wife Swap" the series.....

Except instead of arguments over the dishes or the kids it will be over bike bits in the dishwasher, or tantrums over having to check his tyre pressures/oil himself :P

Originally Posted by SoulKiss

Get in touch with Channel 4 then.

"Biker Wife Swap" the series.....

Except instead of arguments over the dishes or the kids it will be over bike bits in the sink, or tantrums over having to check his tyre pressures/oil himself :P

One of my mates go into major trouble when he forgot to remove a set of crankcases from the dishwasher before his missus got home. They did come up incredibly clean though.

he is rich, lets face it that is one big attraction to women, no matter what anyone says most can be bought!! Do you yhink Wayne roony would be with his bird if he was not loaded, nope. and lok at the likes of hugh hefner and bernie ecclestone or peter stringfellow, the only reason they have the girl they do is cos of money!! money grabbing who**s all of them .

Originally Posted by neio79

he is rich, lets face it that is one big attraction to women, no matter what anyone says most can be bought!! Do you yhink Wayne roony would be with his bird if he was not loaded, nope. and lok at the likes of hugh hefner and bernie ecclestone or peter stringfellow, the only reason they have the girl they do is cos of money!! money grabbing who**s all of them .

Hey not all women!!! we`re not all like that. Money certainly wouldn`t be an attraction for me. I dated a millionaire a few years ago, it lasted a few months and then I dumped him. And no, I had no idea how rich he was til we were actually dating.

Superficial women might be with someone solely cos of the size of their bank balance but there`s far more important things.

Originally Posted by Speedy Claire

Hey not all women!!! we`re not all like that. Money certainly wouldn`t be an attraction for me. I dated a millionaire a few years ago, it lasted a few months and then I dumped him. And no, I had no idea how rich he was til we were actually dating.

Superficial women might be with someone solely cos of the size of their bank balance but there`s far more important things.

yeah got a bite!! LOL I know not all women are like that, but you look at the type of women that are seing some of the people i mentioned and you know they are doing it for the money.

Saying thati would take one for the team if it meant i got loads of money, oh look love the light bulb hass gone again

Originally Posted by Speedy Claire

I think this is a far more suitable girlfriend for him.......

LOL. Claire, you're bad!!

Originally Posted by neio79

he is rich, lets face it that is one big attraction to women, no matter what anyone says most can be bought!! Do you yhink Wayne roony would be with his bird if he was not loaded, nope. and lok at the likes of hugh hefner and bernie ecclestone or peter stringfellow, the only reason they have the girl they do is cos of money!! money grabbing who**s all of them .

Money is definitely not an attraction to me!!

I'd rather have an average man that loves me completely than one with a fat bank account who expects me to worship the ground he walks on!

Originally Posted by Speedy Claire

...

Superficial women might be with someone solely cos of the size of their bank balance but there`s far more important things.

No, from what you have said, you rank looks higher than bank account or charisma/personality ... I am not sure that is any less superficial