your views if you will

[ophic]

Originally Posted by madness

What I was trying to provoke, which I obviously failed to do, is a little thought that, if paedophilia is in some way genetic, and that paedophiles cannot control thier sick cravings, does that automatically give us the right to kill them.

Yes.

Like I said in my original post, if killing them stops them harming more children then yes, I think I would agree with a death sentence.

[hindle8907]

if he did it then yes he should be burnt alive

Originally Posted by Milky Bar Kid

Like I said in my original post, if killing them stops them harming more children then yes, I think I would agree with a death sentence.

I'm playing devils advocate again here, but surely more children are harmed by drugs than paedophiles, so do we kill all drug dealers?

madness i can see what your getting at with your original comment but in no way can you compare a drug dealer with a childabuser/murder-the later gains sexual satisfaction from objecting a child to horrific abuse-whether this is a genetic characteristic(sp) or not makes no difference-it is not an excuse-if you have a dog which attacks everything and anything you do the right thing and get it chapped, if a wild animal attacks humans it gets chapped-i see no difference between the behaviour of animals and that of humans, and therefore i given the choice would treat both the same and gladly carryout the punishment.

Originally Posted by madness

I'm playing devils advocate again here, but surely more children are harmed by drugs than paedophiles, so do we kill all drug dealers?

Wow, I can't really get your comparisons on this issue at all!!

How many of the kids who are addict to hard drugs do you think have been sexually abused at some point or another to varying degrees? Ask anyone that deals with this day and day out and they will tell that there are a HUGE amount of kids on drugs who have been!!!!!!

At the end of the day, like was answered to your last silly comparison, drugs are normally a consensual thing.

[yorkie_chris]

Anyone against, if it was your kid, I'd wager you'd cut more than his head off...

Originally Posted by madness

I'm playing devils advocate again here, but surely more children are harmed by drugs than paedophiles, so do we kill all drug dealers?

yes

ps, it seems to me some people don't know what devils advocate means, it does not mean you agree with what you are saying , you say it to provke a reaction , as you can tell it works.

Erm, I think we all know what playing devils advocate means.