Idle Banter For non SV and non bike related chat (and the odd bit of humour - but if any post isn't suitable it'll get deleted real quick).![]() |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#41 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
[quote=Flamin_Squirrel;1537046]And should you die riding a motorbike, which is infinitely more likely than you ever getting blown up, would you like your family to crusade in your name to have biking banned?
/quote] Poor comparison really. generally the risk here is to the motorcyclist himself. He does not intentionally set out to harm either himself or others. There are risks but no criminal intent to do harm. The comments I passed earlier obviously I guess would seem reasonable in a perfect world where Police are doing what they are emplñoyed to do and innocent people are neither threatened by fanatics or the authorities. Even if I were arrested as a suspect terrorist,gall me greatly indeed it would but my inocence would be finally proven. Darn there goes me and my fanciful perfect world nonsense again! |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,083
|
![]() Quote:
The way it was used before Gleneagles was really quite cunning, and obviously premeditated- they just arrested everyone on the buses (apart from the drivers) then released them a couple of hours later without charge. By that time it was too late to get to the demo, but they can say "Hey, it was only a couple of hours, that's a small price for safety surely?" The impact was huge in publicity terms, it totally gutted the protest but the impact per person was minor and easy to shrug off.
__________________
"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day We like what we like, we hate what we hate But we're oh so easily swayed" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Adolf Hitler didn't create Nazi Germany in one fell swoop, he just passed lots of incremental laws that in themselves didn't seem significant, but resulted in his totalitarian state. By the time people realised, they couldn't do F all about it. We are certainly going the same way, the terrorist laws basically mean detention at whim. Just wait till we've all got ID cards and total DNA databasing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I've only read 2 or 3 pages of this thread and one thing seems to be escaping me completely I guess...
Why are you worried about the length of detention when you need to be actively involved in terrorist activities to have it envoked upon you?? Is the ORG cultivating a terrorist cell on the quiet perchance ?? |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Ironically this has all come about because they're trying to be transparent and above board. In the old days, when they needed to get rid of a few IRA guys, they just sent the SAS round in dark sweaters to terminate them. That never caused much furore as I recall, just seemed appropriate?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#48 | |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,083
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day We like what we like, we hate what we hate But we're oh so easily swayed" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Ah yeah sure.
I mean, when Faulkner introduced internment in 1971 that stopped the IRA in their tracks. Oh wait. But but, no, I mean, bad example... ok, Gitmo, Camp X-Ray, unmarked Prison ships, that all worked out in the end for the US, right? ...right? |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|