![]() |
#21 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
you appear to have something box-shaped stuck to the back fo your bike????
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
As you well know northy, compression damping is there to slow the rate at which the spring is compressed; not to provide springiness! Basically if you put treacle in there you would struggle to ‘bounce’ the suspension as it is so heavily damped, I suppose it might give the illusion of being ‘stiffer’ … However in actual fact, stick a 10kg weight on the front and the nose of the bike will go down X mm just the same as if you put water in there … the only difference is that with the treacle it would take much longer to sink to X mm!! …
I suppose we are talking more about compliance than stiffness … The SV is fitted with a damper rod mechanism for the damping, which is in essence a simple orifice setup, as such the damping force grows with the square of the velocity. So unfortunately although increasing the oil weight will improve slow speed damping and make the bike feel more solid at the front (as it sinks slower), the suspension would then tend toward not being compliant enough and ‘spike’ the rider on high speed (sharp) bumps. The reason the SVs front end feels so poor is the damper rod setup … with damper rods you are dammed if you do, dammed if you don’t ![]() ![]() So back to the start, the only true way to 'stiffen' the suspension (and not sacrifice compliance) is to increase the spring rate (and then add the appropriate new oil to accompany its rate). Last edited by Blue_SV650S; 14-12-07 at 10:36 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
SO blue, is there anything that can be done to mod the standard forks to make the damping better? Some people have mentioned emulators, what do these do and how effective are they?
Matt |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Yes, you need to get rid of the damper rods!!!
![]() The better method of doing business is like you find in ‘cartridge’ forks – prolly best if you do a bit of goggle-fu - but essentially in a cartridge fork you have ‘petals’, these are little thin/flexible discs of springy metal that close a much larger damping hole. When you try and pass fluid through the hole/petal (compress the fork), the petal bends/opens allowing flow (hence movement) it provides the physical damping in much the same way as an damper rod at this point, but the beauty of using petals is that you essentially have a variable diameter orifice so you can have a much wider range of controlled operation!! Lovely!! ![]() Picture it, the quicker you you try and push fluid through, the more the petals will bend/open allowing faster flow of fluid, unlike the damper rod ![]() An ‘emulator’ is basically just that, it is emulating this superior cartridge setup. In the SV you drill the damper rods to lessen/try and negate their effect and slot the emulator in there. The emulator has/is a little (yet basic) petal stack – job done!! … unfortunately its not as good as a full cartridge as the emulator only works on the compression damping (and is very basic/crude in design) … Last edited by Blue_SV650S; 14-12-07 at 11:11 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Picture speaks a thousand words!!
![]() Damper rod:- ![]() proper cartridge:- ![]() Emulator:- ![]() Last edited by Blue_SV650S; 14-12-07 at 11:21 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I see, thanks blue! How much more of a differance do they make, and coupled with some decent springs (e.g. ohlins), is it a good upgrade for the price?
Matt |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wakefield, West Yorks'
Posts: 1,129
|
![]() Quote:
I should be able to tell you after crimbo - thats my job for boxing day ![]()
__________________
'52 Curvy S | So good.....it made me want to trump! If at first you don't succeed - use more gaffa tape. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
![]() If you are lacking confidence in the front, then it is ~£200 well spent! I have emulators, 15w oil and 80 Racetech springs in my trackbike and – although not as planted as full cartridge forks I have ridden, it’s a very good setup!! – you have seen the antics I get up to on my trackbike, the upgrade kinda speaks for itself ![]() However I have totally standard setup in my roadibke … its rubbish, but it does all I need it to and I can’t justify spending £200 on something that is already doing all I need of it … So essential upgrade – probably not – makes a noticeable difference when done – very much so ![]() The choice is yours ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Ta blue. I'll keep it in mind for the future when im finding limits; at the moment I'm finding that simply becoming a better rider gives me better feeling and response from the front, so I dont need to do any upgrading of the bike yet. Might want a new rear shock at some point, i expect thats a bit tired by now!
Ok, you can all go back to arguing and whatnot Matt |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What do i need to convert the 1999 (no preload adjusters) to having preload adjusters and progressive springs. | sv_rider1990 | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 12 | 11-07-08 05:15 PM |
preload adjusters. | scottjames | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 16 | 28-04-08 04:06 PM |
Fork preload adjusters on a curvy? | Berlin | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 12 | 06-09-07 08:00 AM |
K4 fork spares, damper tubes,preload adjusters,fork lowers | ianofbhills | For Sale - SV's and SV related items | 11 | 13-03-06 06:58 PM |
FORK PRE-LOAD ADJUSTERS ON A 'NAKED' | alexb | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 4 | 21-01-05 09:19 PM |