SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum



Idle Banter For non SV and non bike related chat (and the odd bit of humour - but if any post isn't suitable it'll get deleted real quick).
There's also a "U" rating so please respect this. Newbies can also say "hello" here too.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 18-01-08, 11:06 PM   #11
yorkie_chris
Noisy Git
Mega Poster
 
yorkie_chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Halifax/Leeds
Posts: 26,645
Default Re: Any physicists out there?

Forgot to mention ... you silly medic, physicists are no good in the real world, you want an engineer
__________________
Currently Ex Biker
Now rebuilding a 63' fishing trawler as a dive boat
yorkie_chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-01-08, 11:24 PM   #12
the_lone_wolf
Captain Awesome
Mega Poster
 
the_lone_wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hamble
Posts: 4,266
Default Re: Any physicists out there?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Rich View Post
But focussing on the deadspace issue, we normally say that its the increase in deadspace volume that causes problems breathing through tube. Dont try it but believe me it will. But although you cant breathe properly through a 3m tube that is say 1cm wide as deadspace is then an extra 300ml (your own is about 200ml), obviously you could have a tube 30cm long and 10cm wide, which would be fine but the volume is the same.
the volume of those two tubes is not the same though, note that the volume of a cylinder (or your circular tube) is proportional to it's length, but proportional to the square of it's diameter

volume of your tube equals length multiplied by pi multiplied by the radius squared

therefore tube one is 3m long and has an internal diameter (for argument's sake) of 0.005m (half of 1cm, remember radius not diameter) - the volume is 3.142 * 3 * (0.005)^2 = 0.000236cu.m

tube two has length 0.3m and internal diameter 0.1m, therefore the volume is 0.00236cu.m

so tube two actually has ten times the volume of tube one...

i'm not understanding what you mean with dead space however, if you want to explain it to a physicist with no medical knowlegde i'll have a stab though
__________________
Official "Dumbass of the Year" 2011
(•_•)
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)
Deal with it...

Last edited by the_lone_wolf; 18-01-08 at 11:43 PM. Reason: added calculations
the_lone_wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-08, 12:20 AM   #13
K
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Any physicists out there?

Surely the ultimate question is whether you could still make that annoying slurpy-suckey noise whilst attempting to drain the last dregs of cola from the bottom of a glass by using a 3m long straw?
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-08, 12:24 AM   #14
yorkie_chris
Noisy Git
Mega Poster
 
yorkie_chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Halifax/Leeds
Posts: 26,645
Default Re: Any physicists out there?

Yes but it would depend on the surface tension of cola, and the distance between the edge of the tube and the bottom of the glass. I also have a suspicion that the shape of the tube walls would play a part as well as the usual wall conditions determining pressure loss, and hence possible flow...

Oh wait, you were taking the pi$$....
__________________
Currently Ex Biker
Now rebuilding a 63' fishing trawler as a dive boat
yorkie_chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-08, 01:19 AM   #15
the_lone_wolf
Captain Awesome
Mega Poster
 
the_lone_wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hamble
Posts: 4,266
Default Re: Any physicists out there?

Quote:
Originally Posted by yorkie_chris View Post
Yes but it would depend on the surface tension of cola
the relevant contact angle wouldn't just depend on the surface tension of the cola, you also need to consider the relative hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity of the material used to construct the container or straw and their microscopic structure...
__________________
Official "Dumbass of the Year" 2011
(•_•)
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)
Deal with it...
the_lone_wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-08, 08:33 AM   #16
the white rabbit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Any physicists out there?

Ah yes, the volume calcs are wrong, doh. However I think the problem remains the same as if volume were the determinant as you commonly read then tube 2 would be much much worse in this scenario, which it isnt for the reasons well put.

As someone said above not all the fresh air we breath in gets to the area where gas is exchanged or is used in exchange. Deadspace is the volume of the respiratory system that is not involved in gas exchange. Anatomical deadspace is the trachea and bronchi, where you will not absorb O2 and shed CO2. That deaspace contains a stale air mix which gets taken back into the lungs in the next breath, also. Alveolar deadspace is unperfused or unventilated alveoli (where gas is exchanged), and can be considered negligible for the purposes of this in a normal individual. Deadspace is about 150 to 200ml. So of a typical 500ml breath in we only use about 350ml or so in gas exchange. So the tube adds deadspace to that value, in the case of a tube maybe another 350ml, the total deadspace is 500ml. As a typical inspiration is 500ml (this varies of course) then in this case the total inspired air is deadspace air, and there will only be minimal mixing of fresh and stale air, not sufficient to properly oxygenate the alveoli and remove CO2.

[my respiratory physiology isnt that strong, btw, I'm best once we get stuff inside the body, so to speak, and my physics is **** poor]
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-08, 08:38 AM   #17
the white rabbit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Any physicists out there?

Quote:
Originally Posted by K View Post


*Sorry, it's the student response.*
Go away and caluculate the deadspace of the horse, sorry 'pony'.

*Standard lecturer response faced with veteriniary students.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-08, 08:39 AM   #18
the white rabbit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Any physicists out there?

Oh, and the reason I am worrying about this is people mostly say volume of tube and some say length and I am trying to work out the determinant.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-08, 08:40 AM   #19
the white rabbit
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Any physicists out there?

Quote:
Originally Posted by yorkie_chris View Post
Forgot to mention ... you silly medic, physicists are no good in the real world, you want an engineer
Dont they all just fiddle with computers these days





and mend TVs and washing machines
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-01-08, 09:02 AM   #20
Richie
fantabulas
Mega Poster
 
Richie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Nr Durham
Posts: 4,940
Default Re: Any physicists out there?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Rich View Post
Dont they all just fiddle with computers these days





and mend TVs and washing machines
Just like bad porn movies... bowchickawowwow...
wait this porn films not ready yet...
Why is that man fixing that washing machine...?
__________________
My Flickr photos
Richie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.