![]() |
#11 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sunny Glasgow
Posts: 1,715
|
![]()
If I want to stretch out a tankful I will sit at 65-70 (Usual 80mph).
Big difference in consumption. And still safe and not causing an annoyance. Got me to the magic 200 mile on my GSX14 from a 22ltr tank with juice to spare. Only the once mind. I love getting happy on the throttle. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Whyteleafe
Posts: 3,395
|
![]()
Got any explanations to back that up?
__________________
Silver SV650SK3, Fuel exhaust |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
Where the hell am I?
Mega Poster
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Swingin' thru the urban jungle
Posts: 7,451
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
I agree in principle of course with what most of you have said, excpt for Quiff of course, but i'd love to see a calculation proving a certain speed in MPH cos its obviosuly a lot of factors that can change it, like headwind or tailwind etc. I''m sure the combined talents of the Org will mena there is someone who will know...or can work it out.
__________________
. "Computers are great! Not for communicating tho. They have one fundamental flaw ... they don't have eyebrows." AlpineCarStereo: you win ....... eeerrr ..... ummm ..... my undying support of you, the greatest Mod this forum has ever known. My Leige. davepreston: ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Whyteleafe
Posts: 3,395
|
![]()
Not saying its wrong, just would like to hear the theory behind it before I believe it.
__________________
Silver SV650SK3, Fuel exhaust |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I'd guess it's because the engine will "pull" the best, IE you'll need less throttle to go up a hill ETC, basically it just has the most available pulling power with the minimum of throttle input
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Where the hell am I?
Mega Poster
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Swingin' thru the urban jungle
Posts: 7,451
|
![]() Quote:
I wanna know specifically for an SV with its own engine charachteristics what would be the optimum speed cos i'm certain that its not the same as a car!
__________________
. "Computers are great! Not for communicating tho. They have one fundamental flaw ... they don't have eyebrows." AlpineCarStereo: you win ....... eeerrr ..... ummm ..... my undying support of you, the greatest Mod this forum has ever known. My Leige. davepreston: ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Whyteleafe
Posts: 3,395
|
![]() Quote:
at 35mph in top gear, the engine may be less efficient but the drag on the vehicle has dropped by a factor of 4, so unless the engine is 4 times less efficient at 3500rpm than 7000rpm (which i doubt) then you'll go further on the same fuel at 35mph.
__________________
Silver SV650SK3, Fuel exhaust |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Whyteleafe
Posts: 3,395
|
![]()
ah-ha i've spotted my own error - the drag is 4x less but the vehicle has to push through it for twice as long. So the engine only has to be 2x less efficient at 3500rpm - i still doubt that its the case.
__________________
Silver SV650SK3, Fuel exhaust |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I got 155 miles on 10 liters at between 60 and 75mph with some occasional full throttle bursts riding back from Yorkshire..
So on the SV I'd guess about 60-70 would be fine! |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most economical family car - Which? | krhall | Idle Banter | 15 | 18-03-08 09:08 PM |
Most economical fast bike? | Stu | Bikes - Talk & Issues | 51 | 05-06-07 11:38 AM |
Economical Driving | krhall | Bikes - Talk & Issues | 32 | 27-03-07 01:36 PM |
Motorway fun | rpwoodman | Idle Banter | 6 | 02-11-06 10:39 AM |
Most economical motorway speed? | thor | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 29 | 23-01-06 02:28 AM |