SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking Discussion and chat on all topics and technical stuff related to the SV650 and SV1000 Need Help: Try Searching before posting |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#11 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
i use my sv for a 50 mile round trip myself and carnt fault it reliable cheap to run and there is a much great resouce of people parts and place if you have any problems.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
No, I don't lend tools.
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Skunk Works, Nth London
Posts: 8,680
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Back to the point: See if you can get a buzz on an ER6 as well as the obvious competition, that should tell you which one you want. I don't doubt that the Kwak is a fine bike, and as the reason for building it is to try and wrest some sales from Suzuki and the SV, it's unsurprising that the numbers are similar in many respects. This being an SV based forum it can be difficult to get a balanced view, whilst the SV is a great bike all the bikes mentioned above are worth your attention. Except the H*n*a naturally
__________________
If an SV650 has a flat tyre in the forest and no-one is there to blow it up, how long will it be 'til someone posts that the reg/rec is duff and the world will end unless a CBR unit is fitted? A little bit of knowledge = a dangerous thing. "a deathless anthem of nuclear-strength romantic angst" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
What a response!!
I'm going to see a the kawasaki on thursday so we'll see. I am a little concerned that the riding position may be a bit vertical but I do like the styling. Many thanks Paul |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
But then I'm not keen on the Supermoto stylee thing that's becoming popular either. I must be getting old! RR |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
The SV wins hands down! Aluminium frame, centrally mounted rear shock, nicer styling (and you can add faring lowers if you want), narrower motor, years of R&D, etc. The Kwak is heavier, steel framed, slightly less powerful, and think of the uneven forces on the swingarm with that shock.
Jon. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,083
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day We like what we like, we hate what we hate But we're oh so easily swayed" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Maybe not to the handling (at first), but I think it may wear the bushes unevenly, and then affect the handling. I could be wrong though. It doesn't seem a sound engineering job.
Jon. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
Dal |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,083
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day We like what we like, we hate what we hate But we're oh so easily swayed" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
All the above ! But we all forgot something : parallel twins are sooooo boring compared to a V-twin !
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|