SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum



SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking Discussion and chat on all topics and technical stuff related to the SV650 and SV1000
Need Help: Try Searching before posting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 30-05-06, 05:44 PM   #11
northwind
Moderator
Mega Poster
 
northwind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by motorolly
Your right about the rates changing but it isn't worth worrying about, usually the linkage is changed to alter the rates.
When I raced mine it was 2" up at the back and 1.5" dropped at the front on a set of GSXR750 forks, the comparison in the handling was chalk and cheese.
Now as a supermoto its up so high the swingarm just touches the linkage on no load and the suspension still works fine! Its hard to compare as the handling is (great but) so different now!
Experiment, jack up the back of the bike, dog bones off, sit it at the height that feels good, measure the bolt centre and drill some steel bar of the right size, bolt on, test ride, make new ones as required. It doesn't take a lot of difference to in centres to raise the bike a lot.
I want to hear more about your bike But I'd not be as cavalier about the linkage rate. Yes, it's common to change linkages to alter the rates, but here you're changing the linkage to do something else and you have really no idea where it's going to go. I've run the same height with the shock lengthened and with short dogbones, and the two were noticably different- with the dogbones, it felt rather harsh, ragardless of what was done with the damping.
__________________
"We are the angry mob,
we read the papers every day
We like what we like, we hate what we hate
But we're oh so easily swayed"
northwind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-06, 06:05 PM   #12
riktherider
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

cheers johm. i'll compare those sizes with the ones i have currently. probably mill a couple as well, see how it goes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-06, 06:51 PM   #13
motorolly
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by northwind
I want to hear more about your bike But I'd not be as cavalier about the linkage rate. Yes, it's common to change linkages to alter the rates, but here you're changing the linkage to do something else and you have really no idea where it's going to go. I've run the same height with the shock lengthened and with short dogbones, and the two were noticably different- with the dogbones, it felt rather harsh, ragardless of what was done with the damping.
Yep Northwind that is what I mean =) changing the tri-linkage (or shock length which will change the angles) will change the forces acting on your shock. Changing the position between the three pivots (or angle of the L) can radically change the ratios of movement between wheel and the shock, let along the dynamic ratios (the lever the swing arm uses to compress the shock gets shorter as the shock rises, hence harder to compress further and the rate 'rises'). However only changing the dogbones has a very minimal effect on the operation of the suspension, the shock and linkage are untouched. The angle of the dogbones will change a little and the lever that is the swing arm effectively gets shorter as the wheel base reduces (and longer as wheels moves up over bumps) so this is where the very slight change in suspension behaviour will come in.

Can't say I have ever noticed it as it is so small, the weight distribution and change in rake of the forks is much more significant.

I was thinking of milling up a new likage to go with them which would position everything to allow me to fit an XL600 shock I have, I need it a bit softer with more travel. Will be interesting to work out how the rates are affected. Interestingly KTM use a progressive spring rather than linkage, which presumably means damping is not affected as the wheel rises, just spring force.

I'll post some pics when the bike has progressed a little more, its just from the single track roads of Mull and the west coast where nothing could keep up =)
  Reply With Quote
Old 30-05-06, 11:11 PM   #14
northwind
Moderator
Mega Poster
 
northwind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by motorolly
Can't say I have ever noticed it as it is so small, the weight distribution and change in rake of the forks is much more significant.
That's why I tried it both ways, just out of curiosity. I was pretty surprised.
__________________
"We are the angry mob,
we read the papers every day
We like what we like, we hate what we hate
But we're oh so easily swayed"
northwind is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
teh "what you doing this weekend thread"...sponsored by Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger the Third keithd Idle Banter 30 18-01-09 11:47 AM
Rear Cylinder "thunking" probably the cams...help Torn-Thorax SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking 3 07-12-06 01:44 AM
SHOCK HORROR"!!!!!".......sort out your rear end.. Captain Nemo For Sale - SV's and SV related items 4 01-06-06 11:51 AM
Rear tyre "refitted"??? Piglet SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking 8 07-04-06 05:52 PM
Front "Braker" or "Rear "Braker" &q BURNER Bikes - Talk & Issues 9 27-02-05 01:04 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.