sentence too lenient?

[Speedy]

In my humble opinion,She has potentially issued death sentence's for the people she had unprotected sex with.

I agree that the 'victims' had a choice to use contraceptives (condoms) and they chose not too.

BUT

I bet they wouldn't have 'slept' with her at all had they known she was HIV positive!

And that is the issue. She lured them into a trap,where they could suffer a long and nasty death,which ultimately she may suffer too.

As for the sentence,FAR too lenient,should be life I think.

Yeah unprotected sex is supposed to be a no no in this day and age (we had it drummed into us at school and on tv and in magazines when i was growing up)
but that Thing deliberately went out and infected guys - manslaughter is what she should've got

Jabba they might not develop aids but think about it you have to declare that on practically every form these days plus like others have said tablets for the rest of their lives - their lifestyles will change significantly and what about if they want kids all the screening they have to go through

Hang her

[Speedy]

Originally Posted by Tara

Yeah unprotected sex is supposed to be a no no these days

Yeah but lots of people take stupid risks,I bet there aren't many that can honestly say they have ALWAYS been sensible,Men and Women.

Originally Posted by Tara

Jabba they might not develop aids but think about it you have to declare that on practically every form these days plus like others have said tablets for the rest of their lives - their lifestyles will change significantly and what about if they want kids all the screening they have to go through

Hang her

Even if you get tested for HIV,I think,so don't quote me on this,you have to declare THAT too,which will affect Mortgages,EVERYTHING!

Hang her? Well I support the death penalty,so wont comment any further on that.

If you know you have the disease and can potentially infect others but do it anyway, you ARE guilty.

She has ruined lives and potentially the lives of others completely innocent of whatever she deemed her victims deserving of, so life it should be.

There is no excuse.

Originally Posted by Tara

Yeah Jabba they might not develop aids but think about it you have to declare that on practically every form these days plus like others have said tablets for the rest of their lives - their lifestyles will change significantly and what about if they want kids all the screening they have to go through

True, but my comment was made after manslaughter/murder remarks and I was just saying that no-ones actually died (yet) so those charges couldn't be brought.

Not seen/read the news but I suspect she/it's been charged with ABH or GBH?

I can't understand why. Why deliberately try to infect someone else with ANY disease? Is it because she feels so angry that she wants to make others suffer? Defeats me. She must be completely screwed up.

As for the sentence - no of course it isn't long enough

[quote]Yeah unprotected sex is supposed to be a no no in this day and age (we had it drummed into us at school and on tv and in magazines when i was growing up)

16 year old daughter was watching Jeremy Kyle this morning and there was a 16 year old on there who wanted here 48 year old boyfriend back. Seems he got to shag her for a few vodka's without protection. Then when he wasnt about she had a quickie with some of his mates again without protection for a few more vodka's. Whenshe was asked why she didnt use protection she said that the blokes she went with didnt like using them. another stupid bint who has a death wish sleeping with some selfish blokes.

H

B*gger got the qoute round the wrong way

H

[Biker Biggles]

It's a legal loophole.They did her for GBH as they could make that stick,but murder or manslaughter were never on as no one has died.The other charge I can think of is attempted murder,and I guess they did'nt feel confident of getting a guilty verdict.
To my mind someone who deliberately tries to kill others should be every bit as guilty as someone who tries and suceeds.Hence the result should be life.

[northwind]

Originally Posted by Ping

If you know you have the disease and can potentially infect others but do it anyway, you ARE guilty.

Yeah, but guilty of what? Potential murder? It's fine to want her done for something, I totally agree, but there's got to be actual legal justification for it too. I wonder, if they die in a decade will it be murder then? Or do we need a new offence? "Causing death by dangerous ****ing"