SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum



Idle Banter For non SV and non bike related chat (and the odd bit of humour - but if any post isn't suitable it'll get deleted real quick).
There's also a "U" rating so please respect this. Newbies can also say "hello" here too.

View Poll Results: Which uses more fuel?
Engine braking 7 41.18%
clutch in and use brakes 10 58.82%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 17-11-08, 02:16 PM   #21
SoulKiss
Member
Mega Poster
 
SoulKiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sunny Croydonia
Posts: 6,124
Default Re: Which uses less fuel?

Quote:
Originally Posted by startrek.steve View Post
Whats a sid squid?
This is a Sid Squid
__________________
Sent from my PC NOT using any Tapatalk type rubbish!!

█╬╬╬╬()i¯i▀▀▀▀▀█Ξ███████████████████████████████)
SoulKiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-08, 02:24 PM   #22
Daimo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which uses less fuel?

Quote:
Originally Posted by breakz187 View Post
I thought that the engine braking causes the vacumn to build up massively, reducing the amount of pressure within the fuel pressure regulator. I thought this was how it worked on injected petrol engines anyway. Obviously the injectors will have different control logic but i dunno...
Think thats a fair bit old on the early injection engines.
Things have come ona long way since then.

But on a modern engine, rolling + in gear uses no fuel, but taking it out of gear and idling uses quite a bit of fuel.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-08, 09:14 PM   #23
Jdawg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which uses less fuel?

Tend to agree with Jambo, modern Fuel Injection systems will not inject any fuel into the combustion chamber when at 0% throttle, however in older FI engines this may not be the case. Anything with a carb will use fuel on 0% throttle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-08, 09:27 PM   #24
Sid Squid
No, I don't lend tools.
Mega Poster
 
Sid Squid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Skunk Works, Nth London
Posts: 8,680
Default Re: Which uses less fuel?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jambo View Post
Depends on the fuelling system. Top Gear took a V8 diesel Audi to Edinburgh and back on a tank of fuel a couple of years back. With the modern FI in that if you coasted with your foot off the gas the FI put no fuel into the engine at all, as the engine braking was keeping it turning. A similar system was much criticised on Yamaha's FZ1 when it came out as it led to a hesitation as you went from negative to positive throttle while cornering.

Carbs, of course will always add a little fuel as long as the engine is turning, but using smooth, gentle throttle in the correct gear and not building up speed that you then need to scrub off helps fuel economy.
He's right. As for the later comment about the Yamaha, all FI systems go 'dry' on high vacuum/shut throttle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jambo View Post
If all else fails, fit a Sid Squid, annoyingly this makes more difference to fuel economy than anything else I've tried.
There's no substitute for being fiscally sensitive, .
__________________
If an SV650 has a flat tyre in the forest and no-one is there to blow it up, how long will it be 'til someone posts that the reg/rec is duff and the world will end unless a CBR unit is fitted? A little bit of knowledge = a dangerous thing.

"a deathless anthem of nuclear-strength romantic angst"
Sid Squid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-08, 09:44 PM   #25
Spikenipple
Member
 
Spikenipple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Trowbridge, Wiltshire
Posts: 490
Default Re: Which uses less fuel?

Are you sure no fuel is injected (FI bike obviously) when the clutch is out and you're engine braking?
That would effectively be the same as flicking the kill switch, which is completely different than just using engine braking (on my bike anyway, it slows you down a lot faster). I was under the impression that it will inject just the amount of fuel it needs to stay at idle speed.
__________________
Had: K7 SV650S in Candy Sonoma Red
Now: MT-09

My old SV

South & West Surfer
Spikenipple is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-08, 10:27 PM   #26
metalmonkey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which uses less fuel?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sid Squid View Post
He's right. As for the later comment about the Yamaha, all FI systems go 'dry' on high vacuum/shut throttle.


There's no substitute for being fiscally sensitive, .
So whats the going price in today's climate for Sid Sqid after maket mod? What does the bidding start at?
  Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-08, 11:00 PM   #27
arcdef
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which uses less fuel?

i read somewhere that with carbed engines it makes a difference to the fuel usage when coasting but with the electronic injected engines they use more fuel when coasting than if you stay in gear as the injectors shut down or something btu i may be talkign out of my bum.....
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel @ the NEC Bassman SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking 4 19-11-07 12:24 PM
Not Fuel, so who else is there? Berlin Exhausts 7 05-09-07 04:11 PM
Replacement fuel light / fuel tap riktherider SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking 7 14-05-07 06:41 PM
Dry fuel BURNER SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking 8 18-11-05 05:09 PM
Fuel cap? Bikerz SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking 3 06-06-05 08:46 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.