SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum



SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking Discussion and chat on all topics and technical stuff related to the SV650 and SV1000
Need Help: Try Searching before posting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 16-07-06, 08:36 AM   #21
Razor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

*reaches for popcorn*
  Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-06, 08:42 AM   #22
timwilky
Member
Mega Poster
 
timwilky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Not in Yorkshire. (Thank God)
Posts: 4,116
Default

Would things not be a damm site easier, if instead of giving advice. simply state, If you do not know what you are doing consult somebody who does.

I was taught how to set my sag by Elmer Fud. The guy teaches suspension for a living. I would rather be shown how to do it by someone knowledgeable than try to work it out by following all the advice given in this thread.

I ain't going to add to this debate by giving the method and dimensions Elmer and now I use as it is adding to the confusion. Perhaps it is time to draw a line under this one.
__________________
Not Grumpy, opinionated.
timwilky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-06, 08:53 AM   #23
21QUEST
Member
Mega Poster
 
21QUEST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: HomeBound
Posts: 3,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by timwilky
Would things not be a damm site easier, if instead of giving advice. simply state, If you do not know what you are doing consult somebody who does.
Tim , I agree with you to a very large extent.
That is why in a lot of cases why I do not readily give advice or make sure the advice is qualified.
Sometimes , what works for me may be the complete opposite of what most might advice.

Having said that sometimes people come up with stuff which IMO is not based on real understanding as in this case.

Cheers
Ben
__________________
Nemo me impune lacessit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lissa View Post
Blue, mate, having read a lot of your stuff I'd say 'in your head' is unknown territory for most of us
21QUEST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-06, 09:46 AM   #24
Blue_SV650S
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by timwilky
Would things not be a damm site easier, if instead of giving advice. simply state, If you do not know what you are doing consult somebody who does.
....

Isn’t that what is being done on a forum???

However, if you mean go visit a professional I disagree!!! Setting up suspension (like many things in life) is not something that requires a professional. What it does require is a lot of research and understanding of what is going on and what all the different bits do, there is a deluge of information out there on the net regarding this. Choosing a source like a suspension site; Ohlins etc, would seem a logical choice to get some ‘expert’ definitions. If you are not prepared to do the legwork, then the easy option is to get someone else to do it. Forums are also a great method of getting information, but the information should be caveat with the fact that it may be misinformed or ill written. The beauty of a forum is that you can have input from many people, so chances are there is a ‘failsafe’ if an error has been made or confusion given by a particular post/reply.

21QUEST has explained the traditional method/definition of ‘rider sag’.
Quote:
“What you are looking for the difference between the measurements of the suspension unloaded(topped out) and the suspension loaded(rider)”
‘Static sag‘ is the same but just under the bikes own weight rather than with the rider plonked on top. You need two beefcakes to hand or a front stand that goes under/in the bottom yoke to measure this. These as far as I am aware are the most commonly used measurements.

Measuring the difference between rider and static sag is what PeterM ‘s measurement is, if I am understanding him correctly. This is something else, but I can see, it is a way of determining if the springs are ‘strong’ enough for you. There is some logic behind this as lets face it a weaker spring will compress more with the same weight added (the rider). But as Robw#70 said in another thread, in isolation it isn’t giving you much and might be misleading if you have the incorrect springs fitted and start messing with preload.

Anyway, back to the original post, setting the ‘sag’ isn’t going to give you jack here, all the sag sets is the preload on the springs. All this effects is the point at which the springs start moving, it will not affect (directly) the overall travel or eliminate bottoming out. This will require new springs or as I mentioned another way to help prevent ‘bottoming out’ is to raise the oil level/reduce the air gap.
  Reply With Quote
Old 18-07-06, 06:56 AM   #25
PeterM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 21QUEST
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterM


Ben, I commend you on your research but I can assure you that it isn't dumb luck that the figure for the rear rider-static sag figure was correct.

Regarding the front, yes you'd want that down to 14-15mm for the track, no argument there. It's interesting (but not unexpected) to see Gostar-Racing and Traxxion give different figures though, no doubt personal preference of whever wrote the notes. Applying that to the road isn't really appropriate though is it? I wish roads had a surface as nice as the track but that's not going to happen. That extra little bit could come in handy on a less than perfect road. This is how it was explained to me when my bike was set up for me by a suspension professional who does both road and track work. That's why I've been a bit dogged here, actually working with someone to get the right setup rather than purely going from the written word without any interaction was very helpful and informative.

As always, it will end up coming down to rider preference though.

For Petes sake I give up. Frankly we have a better chance of Skippy being able understand the concept and point.

You are a complete buffoon with the processing power of an amoeba and more stories than on Jackanory.

At this juncture I will leave you to wallow in your ignorance whilst basking in the glory of your perceived knowledge and understanding.

Peeps will be well advised to ignore your moronic trash.

Cheers
Ben

Don't worry you can have the last word
Ben,

You have demonstrated a complete lack of manners and very little ability in comprehension of the English language and its subtleties. The post that I made was intended to be conciliatory in it's approach but you have chosen to become offensive and rude.

I know what my abilities to process information, learn, research etc. are and my IQ. None of your diatribe or summation come close. A moron is someone with and IQ of around the 15 mark, nowhere near it. Stories? Well what else do you call accounts based on personal experiences and knowledge?

Get a grip on reality, it appears you already have a firm grip on something else, for you seem quite adept at typing with one hand.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19-07-06, 11:23 PM   #26
stirra
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
You have demonstrated a complete lack of manners and very little ability in comprehension of the English language and it's subtleties.
Couldn't help myself..."it's" in the above sentence is a possessive pronoun, so it shouldn't have an apostrophe in the middle...
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-07-06, 09:29 AM   #27
PeterM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ooops . My apologies and duly corrected!
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-07-06, 09:53 AM   #28
Flamin_Squirrel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamin_Squirrel
The original power asked about setting the suspension on, presumably, a stock bike. Where did he ever mention having the correct springs?

You made alot of assumptions, why get anoyed when this was pointed out?
Please check out my first response. I mentioned that the stock springs were most likely too light for him.
Who cares? That's what he was asking for advice on.

Ben is right - it doesnt matter how knowledgable you are, if you completely miss the point in the first place then why bother?
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-07-06, 10:10 AM   #29
PeterM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Without having the right springs to start with you're really wasting your time. Like jetting you've got to have the right size mains first don't you?

You and I both know that fiddling with anything else isn't going to fix any problems, maybe disguise them a little but if you're going to do something right.... Might as well present the options for the guy to consider at least eh?
  Reply With Quote
Old 20-07-06, 10:28 AM   #30
Flamin_Squirrel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterM
Without having the right springs to start with you're really wasting your time. Like jetting you've got to have the right size mains first don't you?

You and I both know that fiddling with anything else isn't going to fix any problems, maybe disguise them a little but if you're going to do something right.... Might as well present the options for the guy to consider at least eh?
Agreed, but that's assuming they have the time/money/inclination to bother. I'm guessing not - they just want a quick fix to make the bike work a little better.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suspension Problem-Front or Rear? andyb Bikes - Talk & Issues 20 08-05-09 08:19 PM
Front & rear brake bolt torque settings required. svsk2 SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking 2 02-05-09 04:13 PM
Front and rear suspension upgrade danf1234 SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking 28 13-05-07 03:20 PM
Suspension settings on K4 Haxsaw SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking 1 22-08-05 08:51 PM
Front Suspension settings MarkyBoy SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking 9 06-08-05 06:06 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.