SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum



Bikes - Talk & Issues Newsworthy and topical general biking and bike related issues. No crapola!
Need Help: Try Searching before posting

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 24-11-05, 09:33 AM   #31
Drunk Mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dangerous bri
this is the passage i was refeering to.

http://www.speed-trap.co.uk/Accused_...ge/The_Law.htm


ACPO Guidelines on speeding, and the UK law regarding prosecution.
Vehicle construction and use regulations require a vehicle speedometer accuracy to be in the range of -0->+10%. The implications are that it must never under-read - for obvious reasons - but may over-read. As the cost of manufacturing a speedometer with -0% error would be very costly they all over-read by a few percent without exception. Even if speed is measured correctly the display may not be accurate, so a speedometer error is allowed. Because of this, the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) have an official formula for calculating a speeding offence. It allows a leeway of 10% plus 2mph. In reality, most speed traps are triggered at higher speeds than this because if they were set bang-on those guidelines, the sheer amount of paperwork generated would overrun the police speeding departments.

ACPO Manual bulletpoints.
If you see this little icon next to something it means that the information there is extremely relevant to you if you're about to go to court. It's information from the 1999 ACPO Enforcement Technology National Guidance Manual. When you go to court, this is one of the manuscripts that could be used for reference. I believe that if the authorities wish to give you a fair crack of the whip, then it is only fair that you are well informed about the procedures and guidelines they will be referring to.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As that passage says, it's still a guideline, albeit an official one.
It talks of the speedo overreading, but never underreading. Surely that means if you follow your speedo, you will never be over the limit. If they can then prove that you were over the limit, logic says that you were doing it deliberately and if you weren't aware that your speedo was overreading, then you thought you were at a speed possibly higher than the one they caught you at.
I don't see how it overreading can possibly be used as a defense against a ticket.
That's how I think it would be viewed, anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-05, 10:28 AM   #32
Professor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks, caines, for clarifying the location. This is the bit of M4
where I travel from time to time, and I know how easy it is to get
carried away (even though I am not a fast rider). On a nice sunny day
it is almost impossible to keep the bike under a 100.

After riding on the M4 I always live in fear for the next few days expecting
a nasty letter in the post. You were just unlucky.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-05, 02:25 PM   #33
Supervox
No more Mr Nice Guy
Mega Poster
 
Supervox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Saaafffend, innit !!
Posts: 1,365
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cronos
Bad luck mate.

It's more luck than judgement that's prevented the same thing happening to a lot of us.
Sorry mate - gotta disagree with you on this one.

I've spent the last 4 years being a relatively ' boring' rider to go on a ride out with - purely due to the fact that I've been sitting with 9 points on my licence.

I knew what my points situation was - therefore I tempered my riding accordingly - the fact that I got through it with no more points was due to my judgement - not luck !!
__________________
Never argue with an idiot - he'll drag you down to his level and then beat you with experience
Supervox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-05, 02:34 PM   #34
Professor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supervox
I've spent the last 4 years being a relatively ' boring' rider to go on a ride out with - purely due to the fact that I've been sitting with 9 points on my licence.

I knew what my points situation was - therefore I tempered my riding accordingly - the fact that I got through it with no more points was due to my judgement - not luck !!
Don't the points disappear after 2 years?
  Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-05, 02:39 PM   #35
creamerybutter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I though it was like 5 years.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-05, 02:48 PM   #36
Supervox
No more Mr Nice Guy
Mega Poster
 
Supervox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Saaafffend, innit !!
Posts: 1,365
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor
Don't the points disappear after 2 years?
Nope - its four years - I thought it was five until I checked the DVLA website.

It can be longer (can't remember exactly how long) if it's NOT a straight forward speeding matter.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot - he'll drag you down to his level and then beat you with experience
Supervox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-05, 02:55 PM   #37
Professor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It seems we really do live in a police state! I think it is a bit harsh to
have to carry these points for 4 years if they were imposed for a relatively
minor offence.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-05, 02:56 PM   #38
jonboy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Penalty points are valid for three years but still appear on your licence for four years.


.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-05, 03:07 PM   #39
Professor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonboy
Penalty points are valid for three years but still appear on your licence for four years.


.
Weird ... I guess people who wrote these rules wanted
to provide work for lawyers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24-11-05, 06:38 PM   #40
northwind
Moderator
Mega Poster
 
northwind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamin_Squirrel
Quote:
Originally Posted by northwind
Tough luck mate. Still, I'm pretty impressed by your attitude, no whining or crying like we sometimes see, no blaming "the system" or bloody speed cameras... Hope I do as well when I finally catch my long-overdue points.
Personaly I think that anyone 'caught' by a machine, especialy one that's more than likely completely inacurate has every reason to bitch
"More than likely completely inaccurate"? Come on... Sure, they can be inaccurate, but try and back up the suggestion that more than half are completely inaccurate. Handheld radar guns can be inaccurate too- in fact, if I recall correctly they're considerably less accurate than fixed cameras.
__________________
"We are the angry mob,
we read the papers every day
We like what we like, we hate what we hate
But we're oh so easily swayed"
northwind is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.