MiniTwin Police part 2!

[andrewsmith]

Originally Posted by green1

ffs we havent been running in a cheating class for the last ex amount of years
there might have been the minor infringement.maybe down to lack of knowledge
or ignorance i dont know.
but all this whinging makes the northern riders look bad .
stick to the rules, monitoring the class to help people out who forgot to read the rules is the only way to go its the future (like garlic bread) .
max #80 . (#80 isnt for bhp by the way its my number)

I wonder if thats what TC252 stands for

Originally Posted by toot

*snigger*

You need some "control" bikes that you know are totally 100% legit and setup bang on for fueling and are running well. You can then use these as the base for overlaying any other runs. After a while your eye will tell you whether the chart you have is right for a minitwin.

Dont just look at peak BHP, the shape of the curve on the SV650 is generally consistant to all bikes, torque also.

[SoulKiss]

Originally Posted by chris #113

tony,dont even bother replying to this southern fairy! he obviously is'nt a racer, probably knows how to nip in & out traffic jams in the smog in london and rides a pizza delivery bike we arnt saying the pair system does or does'nt have any effect on how the bike runs!! it has to be on the bike to pass for minitwin rules!!

Oh dear, some people just don't know anything...

I suggest you perhaps run a search on "posts by user"...

Originally Posted by TC252

H
point noted about the different hp measurements on different model of Dyno.
As far as Ducatis and Er6's are concerned-well it looks like Alex is giving up racing-so thats the Ducatis sorted,

TC 252

There is quite well documented information on the differences between dynopro and dynojet dynos and SAE & the other methods of measurement that would help.

As for the Ducati's they are quite simple to check for legallity to be honest, I can do a series of pictures for Tony / Scrootes which shows legal set up.

I do actually have a technical infringment on my bike; I drilled the swing arm to create bobbin mounting points! Only way I could get it to work with race paddock stand, I'm sure the extra 300 grammes didnt speed me up!

PS deffo chucking it, my transponder is on ebay just now to make sure I cant change my mind

Great to see its now all sorted gents. now get oot and ride the buggerance out of them!

oh, and just a thought on "But my bike as an XZY fitted/missing/modified. Is it still ok"?

If its not Ok, take it off and buy a proper legal one or put it on or do whatever needs doing.

You are making a race bike. to a set standard, if it happens to be over modified its exactly the same as undermodified. It is taken to "standard" spec. Standard, in this case is "Minitwin"

If the bike had JHS cams in it you wouldn't dream of asking "Is it ok if i keep them in"?

However, rules such as drilling the frame to fit, for example, lock stop reducters (commonly known as B&Q door stops) so they don't fall off in a crash etc is common sense and I consider this to be a rule that is at the discression of the testers and examiners. No one is going to get any advantage from such a mod and its common sense for safety. same goes for drilling a hole or two in the very bottom of the frame for fairing mounts.

really missing the racing..
|
C

Just out of interest, if the minitwins are getting dynoed at knockhill will there be a extra charge? cheers leon

Just interested to know what went on at knockhill regarding dynoing and scrutineering of the Minitwins and if it was a success or not.

[andrewsmith]

Originally Posted by crisis95

Just interested to know what went on at knockhill regarding dynoing and scrutineering of the Minitwins and if it was a success or not.

+1

I know there was 1 less in the Modified for knockhill, as pixie was at Olivers Mount

You have got to laugh tho.

[andrewsmith]

How many then Toot?