![]() |
#61 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Don't have a clue on this one, but personally I wouldn't risk it......if you're flat out (130mph) on a puplic road, then your asking for trouble. If I were you I'd spend £200 on the following
1. Rebuilding the forks,spring and oil to suit you. 2. Smaller front sproket (1 tooth less as on the naked) 3. R6 Throtle tube and matching grip of course. 4. Upgraded brake pads and fluid. 5. Do the retard removal thing. 6. Longer Dog Bones. 7. Ride, Ride and Ride some more...no substitute for experience. I'm working on item 7 before trying any of the others. |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
And fitting good tyres And riding lots Matt |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#63 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
Lightening and balancing the crank is well worth while for what your doing. They take about a kilo off which is massive!!. BTW my failed shell was actually a twisted crankcase which was caused when the bearing was pressed into the case. Nothing to do with the engine being tuned..just pure bad luck!!! Also had an overheat but that was due to the head bolts stretching as they had been torqued a few times. Worth changing these for new ones everytime. In fact so far compared to a SS600 tuned motor mines been bloody good especially considering it has 18bhp more than stock in some places on the curve - a nice hooooge big fat mid range!!. Gawd i will miss this bike...the Superstock 600 feels flacid in comparison!!! Last edited by SV650Racer; 30-08-07 at 11:09 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,083
|
![]() Quote:
![]() With the crank lightening, I meant to ask you about that previously but I always forget. That's a lot to shed, are you taking it exclusively out of the crank and counterweights, or also the flywheel and maybe generator? Yours was total loss i think, are you counting that with it? My big question is, was there any loss of usability from the lowered engine momentum... SHould spin up faster but also slow down faster, but that's just theory, doesn't mean anything in the real world. Reason I ask is engine number 2's definately going to get its crank balanced when I get my act together and rebuild it (and maybe some other trickery) but I'm not sure of the pros and cons of going past that. With my main engine, I've always set the limits of tuning at pistons and upwards, so I've not always paid that much attention to what you can do with the bottom end (apart from blowing it up)
__________________
"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day We like what we like, we hate what we hate But we're oh so easily swayed" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
The kilo is just off the crank. Its taken off the large flat surfaces and then holes are also drilled to aid the balance. IMHO it picks up alot quicker as the SV can be lazy uner load, especially with the big bore. We also took most of the windings off the genny making it lighter but it still charges at full rate as i didnt like the hassle with total loss. When the SV with high comp is hot it wont turn over unless the battery has full charge. Making a re start a nightmare should the race get stopped and then restarted.
I didnt notice any difference in engine braking though, but then again using the slipper clutch and prefering not to use the engine to brake the bike i probaly wouldnt notice anyway. It reduces the load the crank has so is better for it in the long run. Very worthwhile if you have the motor apart. Worth looking at the ports too..things you can do there make alot of difference as stock they are very restricted. |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I was wondering, because you talk about low oil level, what has happend to your engine if you start losing (burning) engine oil. Because mine does... It has already 70000 km's on it so maybee a revision of the engine should be a good thing, but what has to be replaced/checked to prevent it losing oil? Do I look at a great cost or not? Can I do it myself? (I have experience in replacing cam's)
And sorry for going off-topic, but with the knowledge we have here running in this topic my problem should be explained in 5 minutes. Not? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Generally at that mileage pistons and rings would benefit the engine. Its normally the rings loose in the bore that cause oil useage. My father in laws FZR1000 used alot of oil (they tend to anyway!)..but with new pistons and rings it halved the amount it consumed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Thanks for the repley.
Am I right to say that I also loose a bit of compression with the bad pistonrings? Or will it only the oilrings be damaged? |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 | |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,083
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Yeah, a bit of head work's a no brainer if you've got them off, not as much as with some older engines I think- every SV head I've seen is pretty tidy, not too much in terms of casting and edging, but the exhaust ports look like there's plenty of space for improvement. Thanks for the info on the crank lightening, I shall file it in the back of my brain. Have you guys done the work on standard bore engines at all? Lightened flywheels and cranks quite often lead to complaints about poor idle, difficulties pulling away from a stop without using a ton of clutch (since the crank and flywheel weight all acts as an energy store... Likewise on/off engine characteristics because of the faster spin-down times. Not all an issue at all on track of course, but I've not found a road perspective for this in the SV, so I wonder if you've any thoughts specific to this stuff (other than engine braking of course!)
__________________
"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day We like what we like, we hate what we hate But we're oh so easily swayed" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 | |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,083
|
![]() Quote:
What might make economic sense for you, would be to find yourself a working top end- SV engines with wobbly big end bearings are dead easy to find, you can buy them very cheaply in otherwise good condition if you shop around and are patient. Then, just swap the heads, barrels and pistons entirely- replaces the 3 main culprits, bores rings and valves. It'd cost you a couple of sets of new gaskets too, and it's DIYable, though not exactly simple. You'd need to be careful of how it was stored though- the bores are cast iron, so if they're not well protected and water gets in it's game over.
__________________
"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day We like what we like, we hate what we hate But we're oh so easily swayed" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
bore da! | conwyrichie | Idle Banter | 33 | 06-04-08 02:24 PM |
Who can fit a big bore kit? | The Laughing Assassin | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 1 | 15-02-08 07:42 PM |
Bore out for an SV650 | danf1234 | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 6 | 22-07-07 06:42 PM |
750cc big bore kit | ljharmitt | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 19 | 09-02-07 09:31 PM |
Big Bore Kit | NSR Mike | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 17 | 06-06-05 08:50 PM |