SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum



Idle Banter For non SV and non bike related chat (and the odd bit of humour - but if any post isn't suitable it'll get deleted real quick).
There's also a "U" rating so please respect this. Newbies can also say "hello" here too.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-09-10, 03:34 PM   #81
Milky Bar Kid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: F%&*&$g CYCLISTS!!! ARRGGGHHH!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bedhead View Post
Well, maybe you should phone Linconshire Police and give them the benefit of your knowledge?

And your qualifications for making such statments are??? Reading the daily mail???? Metalmonkey and YC are correct in what they say.

ALL emergency vehicles are exempt from speed limits (and certain other RT laws) whether they are capable of taking passengers or not. A Paramedic bike or response car is no different if they are heading to an emergency.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-10, 03:37 PM   #82
Milky Bar Kid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: F%&*&$g CYCLISTS!!! ARRGGGHHH!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bedhead View Post
Legal definition of an ambulance

"an ambulance, being a vehicle (other than an invalid carriage) which is constructed or adapted for the purposes of conveying sick, injured or disabled persons and which is used for such purposes. "

Road Safety Bill 2004

Road Safety Bill

24
18
Exemptions from speed limits
(1)
Section 87 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (c. 27) (exemption of fire,
ambulance and police vehicles from speed limits) is to be renumbered as
subsection (1) of that section.
(2)
In that subsection, after “when” insert “(a)” and for “if” substitute—
5
“(b)
it is being used for other prescribed purposes in such
circumstances as may be prescribed, or
(c)
it is being used for training persons to drive vehicles for use for
any of those purposes,
if”.
And this is the problem we have with google.

It says "fire, ambulance and police vehicles". It does not specify "a vehicle described as an ambulance under the definition of an Ambulance under the Road Saftey Bill 2004..."
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-10, 03:37 PM   #83
Bedhead
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: F%&*&$g CYCLISTS!!! ARRGGGHHH!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milky Bar Kid View Post
And your qualifications for making such statments are??? Reading the daily mail???? Metalmonkey and YC are correct in what they say.

ALL emergency vehicles are exempt from speed limits (and certain other RT laws) whether they are capable of taking passengers or not. A Paramedic bike or response car is no different if they are heading to an emergency.
A direct quote from Lincs police?

Oh well, good to see the police are as clued up as ever?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-10, 03:41 PM   #84
Milky Bar Kid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: F%&*&$g CYCLISTS!!! ARRGGGHHH!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bedhead View Post
I know that Paramedic bikes and fast response cars that can't carry a patient are not classed as ambulances and are subject to the speed imit.

Linconshire police are doing a bloke transporting a liver for speeding at the minute, Cambs. cops threw it out but Linconshire are sticking to the letter of the law.
Perhaps carrying a liver is not deemed an "emergency". It would depend how far from the hospital he was, how long he had to transport the liver, etc etc etc. Perhaps carrying a liver is not classed as a prescribed use.

Organ transportation also tends to be different vehicles, not classed as emergency vehicles.

If you are using this as your argument, please provide links to the appropriate news report or information.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-10, 04:01 PM   #85
tonyk
Member
Mega Poster
 
tonyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: On the beach...
Posts: 1,486
Default Re: F%&*&$g CYCLISTS!!! ARRGGGHHH!!!

I like this post. it is well entertaining........
oh and metalmonkey is one of our finest...
right now carry on...
__________________
"Meh" - ASM Forever, RIP. 13/03/1986 - 05/04/2008

"Better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and clear all doubts."
Some days its not even worth chewing through the restraints...

Last edited by tonyk; 04-09-10 at 05:39 PM.
tonyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-10, 04:10 PM   #86
Milky Bar Kid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: F%&*&$g CYCLISTS!!! ARRGGGHHH!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by tonyk View Post
I like this post. it is well entertaining........
oh and metalmonkey is on of our finest...
right now carry on...

And so am I.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-10, 04:12 PM   #87
SoulKiss
Member
Mega Poster
 
SoulKiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sunny Croydonia
Posts: 6,124
Default Re: F%&*&$g CYCLISTS!!! ARRGGGHHH!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bedhead View Post
Err, with the exception of M-way and dual carriageways, the vast majority of roads were actually laid out before the advent of the motor vehicle.
You forgot the <pedant> tags there.

Laid out, yes, but the modern road network is definately aimed at the motorised user,
__________________
Sent from my PC NOT using any Tapatalk type rubbish!!

█╬╬╬╬()i¯i▀▀▀▀▀█Ξ███████████████████████████████)
SoulKiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-10, 04:13 PM   #88
tonyk
Member
Mega Poster
 
tonyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: On the beach...
Posts: 1,486
Default Re: F%&*&$g CYCLISTS!!! ARRGGGHHH!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Milky Bar Kid View Post
And so am I.
oh, well done...
__________________
"Meh" - ASM Forever, RIP. 13/03/1986 - 05/04/2008

"Better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and clear all doubts."
Some days its not even worth chewing through the restraints...
tonyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-10, 04:13 PM   #89
robh539
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: F%&*&$g CYCLISTS!!! ARRGGGHHH!!!

grabs popcorn.......
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-10, 04:20 PM   #90
EssexDave
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: F%&*&$g CYCLISTS!!! ARRGGGHHH!!!

On 1st August 1999, new legislation came into force to allow a fixed penalty notice to be served on anyone who is guilty of cycling on a footway.


However the Home Office issued guidance on how the new legislation should be applied, indicating that they should only be used where a cyclist is riding in a manner that may endanger others. At the time Home Office Minister Paul Boateng issued a letter stating that:


"The introduction of the fixed penalty is not aimed at responsible cyclists who sometimes feel obliged to use the pavement out of fear of traffic and who show consideration to other pavement users when doing so. Chief police officers, who are responsible for enforcement, acknowledge that many cyclists, particularly children and young people, are afraid to cycle on the road, sensitivity and careful use of police discretion is required."
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crazee cyclists!! Razor Idle Banter 5 03-10-08 08:15 AM
Another one for the cyclists... Recommendations? northwind Idle Banter 27 06-09-08 08:44 PM
FAO Cyclists rob13 Idle Banter 14 19-08-08 01:43 PM
London Cyclists... BillyC Bikes - Talk & Issues 36 29-11-06 09:46 AM
Arrggghhh..... Gimme inspiration!!! Anonymous Idle Banter 18 08-05-06 09:14 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.