Office for administrative affairs official credit tracking thread.

[Spank86]

I can search and show you the posts but it will involve a -1 credit if my maths is accurate.

Or you could search yourself and complain if you still think I'm wrong and you'll get a +1 (if correct).


I'm only telling you this because you're the first complainant since the new system was agreed.

[Mark_h]

How the fork have I gone from 3 to 1?? I haven't done anything to deserve this. Please may I ask for a reconsideration or an explanation for my loss of points?

Sincerely,

Agricultural Minister

May I refer you to post #193. Please give careful consideration to any points challenge.

Oh and ...
GMCA
Tomor -1 credit for wrong avatar.

[Runako]

I shall ask the question...

You not took a dump or golden coloured the reserviors across the borders then (Wales into England)??
Its a Welsh national past time

There is only one way "wickage" in NW Guildford, out. We root out those who wish to cross contaminate at the Bridge Gate.

[Thunderace]

bump

[Spank86]

There's been no GMCAs since the last update so you can bump all you like.

[Thunderace]

I know just thought I'd bump this thread so the Sustainability Minister might actually remember to view some threads and give/subtract credits accordingly!

[Spank86]

I've been told I cannot dock him credits due to some small print but I believe there's a possibility that some of his positive credits may get hung up in processing for quite a long time.

Negative credits seem blissfully unaffected by processing issues you'll all be glad to hear.

[Thunderace]

ROCA:

Sunday 7th October,

Spank86 +1 good attendance +1 buying a beast
Wideboy +1 good attendance
Tomor +1 good attendance
Jammy +1 good attendance +1 for entertaining exit from Loomies.
The Idle Biker +1 good attendance
Thunderace +1 good attendance +1 for leading bijou ride back to Aldershot
Fallout -4 for yet again fraternising with the rebels & poor attendance
Mark_h -1 poor attendance
Waynel -10 coz he's dead/missing in action.
Winder -2 for being slow and poor attendance
Rictus01 -1 poor attendance/getting ****ed the night before
DirtyDog +1 for being a dutiful father -1 poor attendance

[Runako]

ROCA:
Sunday 7th October,
Fallout -4 for yet again fraternising with the rebels & poor attendance


NW Guildford is no longer a land of rebels.

Regards

Minister for NW Guildford

[Mark_h]

I know just thought I'd bump this thread so the Sustainability Minister might actually remember to view some threads and give/subtract credits accordingly!

Not a great deal of credit-worthy activity to judge to be honest. Spank's got a new bike but no details as yet shared and nobody yet pointed out it's bound to be stolen with £4k debt associated with it etc which in itself warrants a de-credit from the usual suspects I suppose.

There was a ride-out Sunday with, to be honest, pretty half-hearted ROCAs allocated with no real flavour of the kind of ride, where it went, who nearly killed themselves, or any sustainably learnings to be gleaned from the meagre post.

Jammy has been feeling a bit hurt that nobody responded to his request for a ride-out Saturday and instead of marketing the ride chose to whine like a little girl. However since starting a new college course (no details yet as to nature of course so speculation will follow), taking up fencing (to corral the vicious wild kangaroos of Basingstoke), starting a job in a pub and losing his long-term lover to the wilds of the Midlands he's been more active and available than before suggesting he was just too darn lazy before to bother.

Job who has been lazily re-posting pretty unfunny stuff from the four corners of the internet into the joke section for weeks has overstepped the taste mark and is being hunted by the moral majority for doing so. Luckily while he was .ORGs most-wanted he was off in Germany hunting out pictures of cute puppies being dressed up as pixies to help rebuild his damaged reputation. Unfortunately I suspect German search engines will have returned several vulgar hits which his Jobbiness will feel compelled to repost further damaging his fragile reputation driving Bob further from his grasp.

So with no further ado (what does ado actually mean) on with the sustainability assessment....

GMCA

Spank +2 (for getting a new bike would have been higher had we had a decent wahooo post ref it's qualities beyond I drove it in the rain and it scared me. Just because it's not insured does not stop you sitting on it, pretending to be Thunderace and making motorbike noises in the garage.)

Jammy +2 (for sustainably starting his nail-art course at school to repair the damage his post digging activities are impacting on his hands damaging his tip-gaining chances in the pole-dancing bar he now bog-trolls in.) Query the propensity for hyphens in this judgment; but I feel they are warranted; along with the semi-colons in this query!

Thunderace -2 Fallout -2 (for both failing to abuse and poke fun at Spank's new bike. Shocking lack of focus on both your parts)

Thunderace +2 for organising GM end of season bash would have been higher but you have bottled out of demanding cash from attendees for meat (totally justified in these cash stripped times) which suggests unsustainable weak undertones of woosiness. May I suggest £10-£15 per head for meat and basic beers is not unreasonable give you will shortly be selling big-issue on Aldershot high-street.

Thunderace -2 for a poor ROCA. Generic points allocations are detailed quite clearly somewhere early on and these were not followed. I may have overlooked this had you not docked me points for not attending something I never said I would be attending anyway!

Tomor -2 for neither posting up his exploits regarding rear-shock replacement or for that matter suggesting the return of my aba stand which is now finished with AND augmented by a brand new one of his own!

Mark_H -1 for an overall grumpy GMCA post but it's cold I'm up to my ears in spreadsheets and neither my bike nor scooter have moved for a while.

DaddyJob -3 for joke related laziness and poor taste. No need to discuss further, put yourself in naughty corner and think before posting in future!

Spank +1 for not letting on that we both know where the little black box containing the internet is kept or that the flashing light alternates between blue and orange with a strange cuckoo noise coming every 4th flash.

AndrewSmith +1 for good behaviour

Have I missed anything/anyone?

SPAM
Fallout +3 if evidence of riding minister of cakes can be provided before or during TA's BBQ
Tomor +3 if Falloutesque comedy how-to for rear shock vid appears between now and end of October
Mark_H +2 once I've proven that LEGAL, SAFE & CONSIDERATE (ie, sustainable) filtering is something I'm actually pretty good at!
AndrewSmith -10 if +1 above drives return to historic behvaiour.

[Mark_h]

GMCA Supplement

Spank +1 just noticed your new SIG. - Nice:)
Daddyjob -1 Just remembered your behaviour ment my wallpaper joke got ignored.

Please see below for re-pasted (see what I've done there) wallpaper joke.

My bedroom needed re-papering. I knew the neighbour downstairs had recently re-papered the exact same room in his flat, so I went and asked him how many rolls he had bought. "Seven" he replied. So off I went, got the paper and did my bedroom. I papered everything: inside the cupboards and behind the lightswitches. I had two rolls left over. Went back to see him and told him that I didn't understand how, but that I had two rolls left over. "So have I" he said.

[Edit] Now this has moved the main GMCA off the last page so those real-lazy last-post clicking types will have to go back a page AND read a long post. Oh well; can't be helped.

[Spank86]

Spank +2 (for getting a new bike would have been higher had we had a decent wahooo post ref it's qualities beyond I drove it in the rain and it scared me. Just because it's not insured does not stop you sitting on it, pretending to be Thunderace and making motorbike noises in the garage.)
It's insured, just not taxed and I have been sitting on it in the garage, its been up and down the drive a few times and round the block too.

Difficult to gauge its qualities from just that though.

[andrewsmith]

AndrewSmith +1 for good behaviour

Have I missed anything/anyone?

SPAM
AndrewSmith -10 if +1 above drives return to historic behvaiour.

Muwahahahahahah

[Thunderace]

Bugger me I lost a feck load of credits there, but a good Idea 'bout the beer/meat money all donations gratefully recieved;)

[Littlepeahead]

Minister for Cakes can confirm that the PM was given a proper spanking this weekend.

First he was beaten soundly at Scrabble despite bonus points being on offer for any words of a slightly smutty origin.

Then he was overtaken on a dual carriageway by Minister For Cakes. Which doesn't sound too bad but M.F.C. was driving a transit van at the time.

His egg frying technique needs some work but he is a reasonable assistant chef in curry making. He should get a bonus point for assisting with a Facebook frape. But lose points because it was the Minister of Cakes' account.

[DJ123]

GMCA Supplement

Spank +1 just noticed your new SIG. - Nice:)
Daddyjob -1 Just remembered your behaviour ment my wallpaper joke got ignored.

Please see below for re-pasted (see what I've done there) wallpaper joke.

My bedroom needed re-papering. I knew the neighbour downstairs had recently re-papered the exact same room in his flat, so I went and asked him how many rolls he had bought. "Seven" he replied. So off I went, got the paper and did my bedroom. I papered everything: inside the cupboards and behind the lightswitches. I had two rolls left over. Went back to see him and told him that I didn't understand how, but that I had two rolls left over. "So have I" he said.

[Edit] Now this has moved the main GMCA off the last page so those real-lazy last-post clicking types will have to go back a page AND read a long post. Oh well; can't be helped.

Your joke was terrible, I only copied and pasted from elsewhere ;) Double standards were being had. Plenty of people who objected more than likely laughed at previous jokes of Micahel Jackson, Gary Glitter, Maddie McCann etc etc. All of which are of the same level and have the same affect. Hence why i didn't post anything up after replying to GG's post.

[DJ123]

Minister for Cakes can confirm that the PM was given a proper spanking this weekend.

First he was beaten soundly at Scrabble despite bonus points being on offer for any words of a slightly smutty origin.

Then he was overtaken on a dual carriageway by Minister For Cakes. Which doesn't sound too bad but M.F.C. was driving a transit van at the time.

His egg frying technique needs some work but he is a reasonable assistant chef in curry making. He should get a bonus point for assisting with a Facebook frape. But lose points because it was the Minister of Cakes' account.

That's because he was probably holding the 2 pieces of frame together with his riding position and trying to hide the orange wheels.

we never got the answer to that Frape :smt018

What cake did you cook???

[Spank86]

Plenty of people who objected more than likely laughed at previous jokes of Micahel Jackson, Gary Glitter, Maddie McCann etc etc. All of which are of the same level and have the same affect.
yes but they weren't made WHILE it was still going on (ok madeline McCann's still missing but she's bound to have been dead for years.)

[DJ123]

Gary Glitter is, Wacko Jacko was and as you say Maddie is an on going one. Not defending, more making a point of double standards.

[Spank86]

But from a normal persons perspective they're all in the past.

Quite a long way in the past at this point.

I think you'd have got the same reaction if you'd made McCann jokes during the initial investiagtion when it was all over the news.

[DJ123]

At this point they are, many were made during the times when they were going on as well. Even being at school plenty of 'jokes' were circulating about certain events.

Back to the thread; You need to update the points in light of the recent ROCA adjustments!

[Spank86]

But were the jokes made HERE?

theres always these jokes around and they don't offend me (well I found the poor construction of your one a little offensive, it was a bit laboured and didnt really make sense but the subject matter didnt bother me) but I've not seen them here before and lots of people on here have young kids.


As for points, there's only been one or two GMCA's, I'll probably update on thursday unless theres a lot more.

[Thunderace]

But were the jokes made HERE?

theres always these jokes around and they don't offend me (well I found the poor construction of your one a little offensive, it was a bit laboured and didnt really make sense but the subject matter didnt bother me) but I've not seen them here before and lots of people on here have young kids.


As for points, there's only been one or two GMCA's, I'll probably update on thursday unless theres a lot more.

There has been ROCA for Sunday.

@Job feck 'em all I thought it was funny, not my kid not my problem, harsh I know but a fair assessment I feel, guess you have to have a robust sense of humour to be a squaddie.

[Spank86]

ROCAs are marks business.

I only administer GMCAs and SPAMs.

[Mark_h]

ROCAs are marks business.

I only administer GMCAs and SPAMs.

Point of order:-
GMCAs and SPAMS are issued by Minister of sustainability
ROCAS can be "recommended" by any attendee and unless challenged by other attendees are considered valid. No sustainability ministerial privileges required in the dishing of ROCAs. In the event the MOS issues ROCAs it is in the capacity of a ride attendee and not MOS.

All points are administered (added up etc) by the Ministry of Administrative affairs. If the burden of administration is becoming too high you may want to consider taking on staff. Job is due some community service and is doing advanced adding up at night school if I remember correctly so would appear a potential Intern.

[Spank86]

Hang on, how am I supposed to know if ROCAs have been approved or just not seen?

I was under the impression that ROCAs would be quoted by the MOS with A GMCA tag added if they were approved.

Otherwise I have to hunt for ROCAs, then hunt back and forth for posts by you to see if they're edited and deal with multiple order lapping ROCAs for the same ride.

Unsustainable.

[Mark_h]

Hang on, how am I supposed to know if ROCAs have been approved or just not seen?

I was under the impression that ROCAs would be quoted by the MOS with A GMCA tag added if they were approved.

Otherwise I have to hunt for ROCAs, then hunt back and forth for posts by you to see if they're edited and deal with multiple order lapping ROCAs for the same ride.

Unsustainable.

Hence give it to the Intern! or....
Consider all ROCAs valid and I'll adjust any that seem to be getting challenged with a well placed GMCA.

[Spank86]

Ok.

Ill continue giving forewarning of my updates and ill do the next one Thursday.

We might have to adjust this if it proves open to abuse.

[Thunderace]

Point of order:-
No sustainability ministerial privileges required in the dishing of ROCAs. .


So are you saying once ROCA has been suggested and not challenged MOS then has no say as to the quality/reasons of ROCA?

[andrewsmith]

You lot

http://www.googabar.com/images/partners/miami_fl_The_Pub.jpg

[Mark_h]

So are you saying once ROCA has been suggested and not challenged MOS then has no say as to the quality/reasons of ROCA?

So long as ROCAs are issued in accordance with the guidelines MOS should have no reason to challenge them. If ROCAs are mis-used then MOS will adjust with a GMCA and severely adjust the ROCA abuser.

[Thunderace]

Your making this up as you go along, but at least you spotted where I was going with my point.;)

[Spank86]

Correct as of 17:45 BST, 12/10/12
Andrewsmith: -1
'Bob': 5
Bordtea: 2
DaddyJob: 13
DaveWeir: 10
Dirtydog: -2
Fallout: -10
GrandDaddyJob: 3
Grant: -2
Jammy: 9
LittlePeaHead: 8
Lozzo: 1
Mark_h: 13
Rictus01: 1
Runako: -2
Spank86: 23
The Idle Biker: 0
Thunderace: 11
Tomor: -3
TonyK: 1
Widepants: 1
Wideboy: -1
Wildkid: -3
Currently tracking is only taking place on those who have received a score all others on initial 0.

Ongoing SPAM tracking:

Fallout +3 if evidence of riding minister of cakes can be provided before or during TA's BBQ
Tomor +3 if Falloutesque comedy how-to for rear shock vid appears between now and end of October
Mark_H +2 once I've proven that LEGAL, SAFE & CONSIDERATE (ie, sustainable) filtering is something I'm actually pretty good at!
AndrewSmith -10 if +1 above drives return to historic behvaiour.
LPH -5 if still promoting rebellion after a presidential visit.

[Mark_h]

Looks to me like Spank could offer a bail-out loan to El-Presidento. Apart from that anolomoli I think it offers a fair reflection on sustainable activity. Without fear of punitive deduction does anyone have any significant comment. Please note any request for re-counts will be subject to the normal Admin fee as previously discussed

[Spank86]

I did recheck my count and the only anomaly is the new bike points which only gives me a plus one from thunderaces ROC.

[Runako]

Andrewsmith -1? That's gotta be wrong! Surely his ROCA has to take into account all his pejorative posts throughout the forum. [This is in no way a challenge to the official count ;)]

[Spank86]

Talk to mark, he's actually had very few official demerits.

Also he's been more or less absent recently.

[andrewsmith]

Talk to mark, he's actually had very few official demerits.

Also he's been more or less absent recently.

I am a smart rebel!

Get others to rebel after starting it ;)

[Thunderace]

The feckless tard returns!:smt019 Must be some GMCA sanctions for derailment?

ROCA:

-25 Andrewsmith, for being all mouth and no trousers, posting all over the GM but not weaseling his way down here for a rideout!:smt019

[Mark_h]

The feckless tard returns!:smt019 Must be some GMCA sanctions for derailment?

ROCA:

-25 Andrewsmith, for being all mouth and no trousers, posting all over the GM but not weaseling his way down here for a rideout!:smt019

Not ROCA related. Refer to ROCA principals posting. Repeated abuse may lead to penalties. Admin office please recredit.

Personally I believe AndrewSmith's behaviour as improved significantly over recent weeks.

While adjusting
GMCA

Fallout +10 for offering to make filmstars out of the .ORG while making his snuff movie

Spank -10 for camera shyness and jeopardising my share options by MIDI-ing up random kit rather than keeping the critical national infrastructure operating smoothly.

Some may think this is a corrective thread but I just happen to think these are significant sustainability issues.

[andrewsmith]

muwahahaha

Mark was beer a bit odd the other week ;)

[Spank86]

One of these days I'll post some of my dads music and you'll be forced to concede it was a legitimate use of time.

[Runako]

muwahahaha

Mark was beer a bit odd the other week ;)

Ridiculous re-crediting! Someone's taking the Michael. Its like X Factor all over again.

[widepants]

not been in here for yonks . What have I missed in less than 5 sentences pls

[andrewsmith]

Everything

[Mark_h]

GMCA Thunderace +2. Visited Casa del-Ace this morning. No only was there a topless blonde drifting about but when I left his Aceness was running down the road chasing Pussy. Excellent role-model.

[Mark_h]

Consolidated ROCA and GMCA for the ride-out Sunday October 14th

As I'm sure you are all aware, ROCA points are awarded thus:-
Run leader +4
Attendees not making a fuss about start time/route/location etc and then turing up righ place right time +2
Other activities of note add and deduct points according to general consensus.

This consolidated post overrides the posts in the 14th thread as those adjustments have been incorporated. Anyone feeling they need to challenge them can take the matter up with my Automated Reviewing Sustainability Engine.

General awards Mark_H +4 for leading ride of 15 bikes when in fact no rideout was planned. Also I feel a bonus point for all attendees for turning up despite it being a tad chilly so default for good attendance = 3 for this ride.

Mark_H +7 (+4 leading, +1 avoiding Thunderace’s highly unsustainable overtake, +1 for staying with the group for lunch despite certain nagging, -1 for braking down on the way home, +2 for fixing it by the roadside and getting home)

Thunderace +1 (+3 for good, cold attendance, -1 for trying to kill Mark_H on A32, +1 for good TEC duties, -2 for being a forum bully these days. )

DirtyDog +2 (+3 for good, cold attendance, -1 for going home early. Almost everyone had to be home by x-o’clock but almost everyone else stuck with it. Poor example from Mod!)

Tomor +2 (+3 for good, cold attendance, -1 for pub finding shenanigans)

Fallout +4 (+3 for good, cold attendance, +1 for unprompted marking, -1 for thinking unprompted marking should be anything other than natural behavior, +1 for acting on Thunderace’s recommendation regarding blind tractor overtake, -2 IT WAS THUNDERACE … have you seen where he overtakes!, +2 for having the foresight to take a knife when going to check for traffic warden)

Spank +3 (+3 for good, cold attendance, +1 for good first showing on the Ace, -1 for buying a bike you can’t reach the ground on)

Daddyjob +1 (+3 for good, cold attendance, +1 for good effort with the two portions of double egg and chips, -3 for off the scale cholesterol given all those eggs.)

Rictus +6 (+3 for good, cold attendance, -2 for running out of fuel, +3 for cool chewing gum fix of Scoobs bling R1 cooling system, +2 for high speed filtering demo on A3 northbound!)

Scoobs +5 (+3 for good, cold attendance, +2 for accepting chewing gum as a perfectly valid repair to a very expensive bike and riding off into the sunset accordingly. Good lad!)

Wideboy +1 (+3 for good, cold attendance, -2 for constantly saying you are going home now, +1 for not going home, -1 for being the ONLY ONE to feel the need to give a lairy blip when parking up on the pavement in the market square. Gives a poor impression)

Tony-K +3 (+3 for good, cold attendance, +1 for apparently hitting road-kill with both wheels during a roadkill avoidance maneuver, -2 for poor observation in not spotting it way earlier, +1 for slightly improved lid putting on activities)

The Idle Bike +4 (+3 for good, cold attendance, -1 for being late, +2 for looking cool in puffa-jacket)

Jammy +1 (+3 for good, cold attendance, -1 for being late, -1 for no promised pillion (I’d even fitted my more comfy pillion seat) +1 for finding neutral first time in Loomies, -2 for riding into Loomies carpark with BOTH feet on the ground, +1 tattoo point as otherwise you’d have got zero which does not feel right)

Quik-D +8 (+3 for good, cold attendance, -1 for being late, +2 for tuning up despite having read the GM bit of the forum, +2 for bringing girls too, +2 as I believe it was you who provided fuel for Rictus)

Mrs.Quik-D +3 (+3 for good, cold attendance, -1 for being late, +2 for brief JBA over lunch, -1 for JBA setting off Rictus’ pace-maker alarm)


Please let me know if I've missed anything significant.

[Wideboy]

Damn, thank goodness that was THE ONLY time I did blip the throttle!





:tongue:

[Mark_h]

Everyone else happy?

[Spank86]

I'm a little confused why you want me to only ride 125s as I can't touch the ground properly on the S4 either.

[Thunderace]

I'm a little confused why you want me to only ride 125s as I can't touch the ground properly on the S4 either.

To be fair to you Ad I think you had an attack of the Jammy's coz we were all watching you on your way into Loomies.;)

[Spank86]

I was being cautious, it was the first time I'd ridden it at anything other than flat out up the motorway and I'm always nervous at loomies.

MOST embarrassing place possible if I dropped it.

[Thunderace]

I was being cautious, it was the first time I'd ridden it at anything other than flat out up the motorway and I'm always nervous at loomies.

MOST embarrassing place possible if I dropped it.

Slightly more embarrassing if you eat half of someone else's breakfast then try and give it back to them!:rolleyes:

[Spank86]

Basically Loomies is just not the place to mess something up.