SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum

SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum (http://forums.sv650.org/index.php)
-   Bikes - Talk & Issues (http://forums.sv650.org/forumdisplay.php?f=129)
-   -   Scamera Van question (http://forums.sv650.org/showthread.php?t=76624)

Flamin_Squirrel 29-08-06 11:05 AM

There is such thing as bad law, or badly enforced law. This is such a case, and I suspect all Scubini is trying to 'get out of' is having his money stolen by greedy ********s with no real regard for safety as they claim.

The police wouldn't have given him a ticket, so an money grabbing untrained civvy shouldnt either.

chunkytfg 29-08-06 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scubini
Quote:

Why would you fight it? If you do get a NIP it just means you got caught doing something which you quite openly admit to doing? Stop trying to dodge out of somthing you had admitted guilt to and accept your punishment like a man.

If you dont want to get caught speeding then you know full well how to avoid it.
OK yes I did break the 'law' but I did not compromise my safety or anyone else's doing it.

I'm guessing that you are one the few people left who don't see these 'safety' camera vans as revenue makers?

No far from it i hate them as much as you obviously do.

I wasnt aware i had said you did anything dangerous only that you did something illegal.

chunkytfg 29-08-06 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamin_Squirrel
There is such thing as bad law, or badly enforced law. This is such a case, and I suspect all Scubini is trying to 'get out of' is having his money stolen by greedy ********s with no real regard for safety as they claim.

The police wouldn't have given him a ticket, so an money grabbing untrained civvy shouldnt either.

Correct b but however bad a law is it is still the law and the police have a right to enforce it.

And how do you know a copper wouldnt have given him a ticket? Just because they occasionally let you off it doesnt mean they will everytime. especially when he gets his identity checked and it allready shows 6 points for speeding

Scubini 29-08-06 11:11 AM

Quote:

There is such thing as bad law, or badly enforced law. This is such a case, and I suspect all Scubini is trying to 'get out of' is having his money stolen by greedy ********s with no real regard for safety as they claim.

The police wouldn't have given him a ticket, so an money grabbing untrained civvy shouldnt either.
Well said that man!

Quote:

No far from it i hate them as much as you obviously do.
If you disagree with their existence why not join the fight?

chunkytfg 29-08-06 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scubini
If you disagree with their existence why not join the fight?

I never said i disagree with there existance did I?

In the right place they have a perfectly justifiable role to play. It's just that they chose to use them in unjustifiable places.

Flamin_Squirrel 29-08-06 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chunkytfg
Correct b but however bad a law is it is still the law and the police have a right to enforce it.

Yes, but they often make decisions on what's the most appropriate way to do this. In this case it might well have just been a telling off, if they'd even bothered to pull him over that is.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chunkytfg
And how do you know a copper wouldnt have given him a ticket? Just because they occasionally let you off it doesnt mean they will everytime. especially when he gets his identity checked and it allready shows 6 points for speeding

As I said above, even if it was the police who chose to pull him over (which isnt garunteed) they may just tell him off, and not even check his details.

Scubini 29-08-06 11:22 AM

Quote:

Correct b but however bad a law is it is still the law and the police have a right to enforce it.
So if there was a law to say round up and kill Jewish people you would support their right to enforce that law?
(OK not the same ball park but you see my point?)

Quote:

I never said i disagree with there existance did I?

In the right place they have a perfectly justifiable role to play. It's just that they chose to use them in unjustifiable places.
So you do disagree with their existence in 'unjustifiable places'?

chunkytfg 29-08-06 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scubini
So if there was a law to say round up and kill Jewish people you would support their right to enforce that law?

I never said i have to agree with the laws only that the police have a right to enforce them

Quote:

So you do disagree with their existence in 'unjustifiable places'?
Yes but define an unjustifiable place?

Scubini 29-08-06 11:30 AM

Quote:

Yes but define an unjustifiable place?
Its your statement you define it.

Jabba 29-08-06 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chunkytfg
Quote:

Originally Posted by Scubini
So if there was a law to say round up and kill Jewish people you would support their right to enforce that law?

I never said i have to agree with the laws only that the police have a right to enforce them

More than that, other law requires them to enforce it. They have no choice about doing it, but they do have some discretion as to how they do it in some circumstances.

However, the scamera vans are not generally operated by the police, and this will have been the case here. Let's leave the coppers (and talk of irrelevant other laws) out of this particular debate and keep it to scameras, eh? :wink:


Quote:

Quote:

So you do disagree with their existence in 'unjustifiable places'?
Yes but define an unjustifiable place?
That could be a big job.... easier to define what is justifiable.

I offer "outside school entrances".


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.