SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking Discussion and chat on all topics and technical stuff related to the SV650 and SV1000 Need Help: Try Searching before posting |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#11 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
Or maybe it's all in my mind. Wouldn't be the first time I have been mistaken - that I can admit to. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Moderator
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the garage where I belong
Posts: 17,083
|
![]()
Um, no offence but that'a pretty horrible guide there... Lots of bike-specific assumptions, but more importantly it contradicts itself constantly- it tells you to use preload to set sag, but also that it's to be used for stiffness- then, when addressing too soft/too hard issues, addresses only damping and doesn't mention preload. It's not all bad but there's too much simplification, some actual out and out mistakes, and plenty of room for confusion. Lots of better guides out there. Ohlins, WP, Traxxion among others will agree with Sid Squid here, but you're absolutely right, you can find people stating it either way quite easily.
__________________
"We are the angry mob, we read the papers every day We like what we like, we hate what we hate But we're oh so easily swayed" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
Having admitted that I will insist that my rear suspension is now 'firmer' than it was before because It compresses less from its current preloaded position than it did before. So there is much less lolloping about going through bends. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
- changes rear ride height - changes rear suspension geometry - which changes the rising-rate ratios & hence *may* make the suspension stiffer - some other things I've forgotten |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
by increasing the preload you will be storing energy in the spring by compressing it, ie the spring wants to decompress so is applying a greater force between dogbone and frame, that effect makes it feel stiffer.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
nope, sorry, but that's not right
stiffness = spring rate [1] people think that the rear end is "stiffer" because it compresses less, but this is beacuse the extra preload causes the suspension to sit higher in its stroke, not because the spring rate has changed (it hasn't) if you go nuts with the preload you can cause the suspension to bottom-out on the compression, or top-out on the rebound, which again can be erroneously thought to be making the rear "stiffer" because you''ll either effectively have *no* suspension on bottom-out, or get kicked out of the seat on top-out [1] all other things being equal - ie damping, etc. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Haha, now I have no idea what's going on. I've tried to get my head round the basics of suspension, preload, sag, rebound, compression damping etc. etc. Too many terms!! Now I'm even more confused
![]() But it has got me hunting round the forums for old info so I can finally try to twiddle with my setup and see how it goes before I consider the 'popular' front spring and oil change. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rear suspension setup | Frank | Bikes - Talk & Issues | 10 | 17-05-09 08:27 AM |
Suspension setup explained. | plowsie | Bikes - Talk & Issues | 4 | 21-01-09 02:29 PM |
Suspension setup? | neillfergie | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 7 | 10-06-08 03:15 PM |
SV Suspension setup | markfc | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 16 | 14-03-05 09:09 PM |
Fatnacker suspension setup | Captain Nemo | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 4 | 21-02-05 01:14 PM |