SV650.org - SV650 & Gladius 650 Forum



Bikes - Talk & Issues Newsworthy and topical general biking and bike related issues. No crapola!
Need Help: Try Searching before posting

View Poll Results: Would you support regular retesting to keep your driving licence?
Yes 26 29.21%
No 58 65.17%
Keithd 5 5.62%
Voters: 89. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 29-04-10, 08:07 PM   #11
ty_uk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Routine licence re-testing - would you support it?

Take enough money of me with car & bike on the road...No No No
  Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-10, 08:08 PM   #12
Specialone
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Routine licence re-testing - would you support it?

Instead of testing, what about assessments every 5-10 years, point out where you have picked up bad habits etc, no chance of losing your license unless dangerous exceptions.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-10, 08:09 PM   #13
fizzwheel
Super Moderator
Mega Poster
 
fizzwheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Somerset
Posts: 3,614
Default Re: Routine licence re-testing - would you support it?

No, on the basis that I was taught to pass a test, not to learn how to ride... I dont see how regular retesting would help, apart from prove that I can ride in such a way to pass a test.

I'd be more in favour of regular training / rider feedback sessions at a reasonable price.
__________________
Look Dave, I can see you're really upset about this. I honestly think you ought to sit down calmly, take a stress pill, and think things over.

K5 GSXR 750 Anniversary Edition
fizzwheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-10, 08:40 PM   #14
cb1000rsteve
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Routine licence re-testing - would you support it?

Yes all day long from me. Driving is not a right. Its a very adept skill. things change over the years. Yes some above have moaned about oldies driving but if you think that some where actually ISSUED!!! licenses instead of taking a test you can see my point. No doubt the rules will change and i'll need to learn new skills but without testing how do i know i'm doing it correctly??
Training more than a full re test. But i do think parking a car should be checked. its not hard to fit a car between 2 white lines!!! But just look at any supermarket carpark for howlers

Last edited by cb1000rsteve; 29-04-10 at 08:50 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-10, 08:42 PM   #15
andrewsmith
Member
Mega Poster
 
andrewsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, Just south of salad dodging country
Posts: 7,750
Default Re: Routine licence re-testing - would you support it?

The mandatory retest is a good concept, but like anything that lines the coffers it'll cost.
__________________
RIP Reeder 20/07/1988 - 21/03/2012. Always missed squire!!!

Every year we meet old friends, gain some new ones, lose old ones and you always remember them all.
“Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.” Mahatma Gandhi
andrewsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-10, 08:44 PM   #16
lukemillar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Routine licence re-testing - would you support it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by fizzwheel View Post
No, on the basis that I was taught to pass a test, not to learn how to ride... I dont see how regular retesting would help, apart from prove that I can ride in such a way to pass a test.

I'd be more in favour of regular training / rider feedback sessions at a reasonable price.
+1. If you took 10 newbie riders and put them through the bike test multiple times on different days, I'll put money that not a single one would have a 100% pass rate or a 100% fail rate. So much comes down to nerves and how people cope with tests etc. rather than the actual ability to ride!

Offering advanced training at a reasonable cost without any kind of formal 'testing' would be better!

Plus if you had been driving/riding for 20 years, had a bad day and failed your test - what then? They take your licence away!? As Dave numbers said, just going to get more unlicenced people on the road.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-10, 08:53 PM   #17
Biker Biggles
Member
Mega Poster
 
Biker Biggles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Barnet Herts
Posts: 5,071
Default Re: Routine licence re-testing - would you support it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjc View Post
no, i want the government to leave me alone.
agreed
__________________
On a clear day we stand there and look further than the ordinary eye can see.
Biker Biggles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-10, 08:56 PM   #18
Bluefish
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Routine licence re-testing - would you support it?

Nope, having passed numerouse vehicle tests first time, i feel that i could pass the test, however that does not mean that i drive like a saint all the time, if at all, so to conclude just because you have passed a test even if it was 1 hour ago that doesn't make you a better driver, it just means you can pass a test if you chose to drive that way, you might choose to drive like a twonk.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-10, 09:05 PM   #19
simesb
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Routine licence re-testing - would you support it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by fizzwheel View Post
No, on the basis that I was taught to pass a test, not to learn how to ride... I dont see how regular retesting would help, apart from prove that I can ride in such a way to pass a test.
It's quite a common answer that - "it just shows that you can pass a test." So why have a test to begin with? Surely to show that you meet a minimum standard? And why should that standard be any lower after 5/10/40 years?

I'm for it; apart from me who is patently perfect , standards on the road are fairly **** poor. I've long argued for regular retesting to ensure that standards are maintained. If anything, you could argue that a 10 year checkup should be harsher than your original test as you have all that experience - you've "learnt how to ride."
  Reply With Quote
Old 29-04-10, 09:24 PM   #20
philbut
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Routine licence re-testing - would you support it?

no - passing a driving test is pi$$ easy, and proves that you know how to drive in the test. it doesn't prove you can actually drive in the real world - hence why so many drivers have an accident in the first year. All it would do is make money from people. The police are meant to stop idiots from driving. Good motorists already pay for all the morons with sky high insurance, why shoud; we have to dip into our pockets again to weed out the minority who shouldn't be on the road in the first place. i'd prefer to see a longer and more comprehensive driving test (look at Finland for example) so anyone who does have a licence can actually drive well to begin with.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Getting a driving licence/bike licence in China? Tim in Belgium Idle Banter 1 26-09-09 07:52 AM
We need your support fuelrallywales Rideouts & Meetings 4 27-07-08 09:30 PM
Orange Support Demonz Idle Banter 8 30-09-06 12:44 PM
TomTom support rpwoodman Bikes - Talk & Issues 16 25-11-05 08:21 PM
Testing Testing ( i hate PCs ) Ablazze Photos 12 10-11-05 08:42 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.