If you could click your fingers and excel at something what would it be???

[hindle8907]

Originally Posted by specialone

, two sisters is wrong.

Speak for your self.

2 sisters is very wrong if they touch too!
urghhhhghghh 100% wrong, if you dont see why just reverse the genders.

[hindle8907]

Originally Posted by Owenski

2 sisters is very wrong if they touch too!
urghhhhghghh 100% wrong, if you dont see why just reverse the genders.

There not my sisters so I'm not Ass-ed ! lol

Originally Posted by Owenski

2 sisters is very wrong if they touch too!
urghhhhghghh 100% wrong, if you dont see why just reverse the genders.

That simply isn't true... You can't just reverse the gender, you lose the tenderness in the process and, of course, 'cause it's a double standard. The sex industry proved that a long time ago..

The gender reversal is to prove the logic, the logic been that Its incest! Im concerned about how many people are defending it, what sort of forum have I joined here. Do me a favour count all your fingers and toes and confirm you've 10 of each please.

Pokey pokey sibling is baaaaaddddd, be it same sex or not. Imagine ur a female and you've got a girlfriend who one day asks her brother to join in the fun, at what point do you say "hang on... this isnt for me". Hopefully its before you find yourself smoking a cig and recounting the disgcusting act that has just taken place.

Well, dear sir, since we are talking logic, let me introduce to you the proof of incest:

You have 2 parents, each of which has 2 parents (your grandparents), each of which has 2 parents and so on.
So, your ancestors grow in number as a power of 2 as you go back in history... Which means, N generations ago, you required 2^N different ancestors.. But hold on, the total population of the earth is finite, hence there exists a level of ancestry, N_0, for which 2^N_0 > total_earth_population... which means some of your ancestors must of coincided, e.g. someone played the pokey pokey with his wives sister and they all lived to have children (and he was probably already related to said sisters..)

So you see, mathematically, we are all based on incest

How's that for perverted science?

Having sex with your wife's sister isn't incest, it's adulterous.

Originally Posted by metalangel

Having sex with your wife's sister isn't incest, it's adulterous.

Now you're just nitpicking

Having sex with two sisters is OK, if they have sex with each other, it can freak you out a bit at first.

How did this thread drift so far? Who started it down this line?

[hindle8907]

if i had never met the sisters before and wouldn't see them again after the act unless for more sex, I would have no issue what so ever taking part with two sisters and them doing stuff with each other.