![]() |
#161 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
if you want to keep a higer ride height then yes but what size i dont know, the higer the tail the faster the turn in so you could add 40mm dogbones and still get a good raise even with the smaller shock and reep the benefits of a more flickable bike
i have the gsxr1000 shock thats 8mm longer than stock (pointy) and 30mm dog bones and 5mm drop on the front forks all of that makes the bike turn in faster |
![]() |
![]() |
#162 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#163 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
^ wt ??? pre load dosent raise the ride hight... the shock is the length it is that cannot be changed, unles you have a ride height adjustable shock
and preload must be set to the right setting for you weight ... |
![]() |
![]() |
#164 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: here as devil's advocate
Posts: 11,569
|
![]()
shocky hight will raise or lower the bike by whatever the size is, e.g. 10mm drop will drop the bike by 10mm.
dogbones will drop the BACK of the bike by what ever the size is, e.g. 10mm drop will drop the back of the bike 10mm. doglegs are 1mm difference to originals = 10mm drop at back of bike. so doglegs that are 3mm longer than standard will drop the back of the bike by 30mm. if using doglegs to lower the bike you also need to lower the front to get any real noticeable difference in ride hight. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#165 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: here as devil's advocate
Posts: 11,569
|
![]()
ooohhh and to raise hight you need shorter doglegs.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#166 | |
Noisy Git
Mega Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Halifax/Leeds
Posts: 26,645
|
![]() Quote:
There's a leverage ratio at play, shock height is not directly proportional to ride height at all. Also dogbones change the entire leverage ratio, so you don't know whether you're making the linkage more progressive or more toward linear, anything could be going on. IMO for more ride height it's better to use a longer shock. That way you're not causing more unknowns by changing the leverage curve.
__________________
Currently Ex Biker
Now rebuilding a 63' fishing trawler as a dive boat |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#167 |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: here as devil's advocate
Posts: 11,569
|
![]()
i'm talking seat hight. i found that using dogbones made very little difference to the hight as opposed to a shorter shocky. the dogbones i got were suposed to lower the bike by 40mm, they never, the shocky i got was about 25mm difference compaired to the original, the bike dropped by about the same hight after i had done it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#168 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Thanks guys, but I think that I'll use standard leng shock 330mm.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#169 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
It makes no sense to use seat height. You measure from axle straight up.
Ratio is about double between shock and wheel travel. If shock compresses 10mm wheel will travel 20+mm (not sure exact on pointy, curvy is about double, pointy changes in travel due to progression in linkage). So, 10mm shorter shock will push wheel up 20mm. It will also pull linkage up in its circle. When you put shorter doglegs to compensate it pulls wheel back down. You restored your ride height and swingarm angle but you totally screwed up how your linkage works. Like Yorkie said, you have no clue any more where it starts, where it ends and where progression is. It is bad enough that stock has progression, never mind adding more. Right way would be to change triangle link and doglegs and get rid of progression. Curvy is little better because it is linear. |
![]() |
![]() |
#170 | |
Member
Mega Poster
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,708
|
![]() Quote:
The shock is attached to the centre of the linkage which is fixed to the chassis (and rotates around) at it foremost point. Lengthening and shortening the shock will move the linkage and alter the angle that it sits at. The dogbones join the linkage to the swingarm and changing their length simply adjusts the angle that the swingarm sits at in relation to the linkage (a side effect of which is to alter the ride height), they do not alter the arc that the linkage will move through as the suspension flexes. They do have some effect on the ratio as they alter the angle that the swingarm operates at in relation to the shock, but it's nothing like as extreme as some persons suggest. I've tried both avenues. First I raised the ride height by adjusting the length of the shock, then I tried keeping the shock the standard length and fitted shorter dog bones. Ride height was the same in both set-ups but the later configuration works much better for me. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rear shock nut and bolt for a diff shock | drag | Stuff Wanted | 0 | 22-04-08 03:52 PM |
Shock spring change | andyb | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 2 | 23-03-08 03:51 PM |
To change the rear shock, do I need to remove the swing arm? | DarrenSV650S | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 13 | 28-12-07 07:42 PM |
sv 99-02 shock change | French | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 4 | 24-02-07 07:47 PM |
change of standard shock | riktherider | SV Talk, Tuning & Tweaking | 17 | 14-12-06 12:48 AM |